2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002610000108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choledocholithiasis: role of US and endoscopic ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this problem, the choices are either to improve the ultrasound technique (oral administration of water, position modifications, administration of fatty meals or medications to increase bile flow) either to implement more advanced modalities (endoscopic, intraoperative laparoscopic, or intraductal ultrasound) or to examine the bile ducts with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Endoscopic ultrasonography is reported to have sensitivity in detecting bile duct stones >90% and specificity >95% [52]. Similar values are reported for intraoperative and intraductal ultrasonography [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60].…”
Section: Choledocholithiasissupporting
confidence: 71%
“…To overcome this problem, the choices are either to improve the ultrasound technique (oral administration of water, position modifications, administration of fatty meals or medications to increase bile flow) either to implement more advanced modalities (endoscopic, intraoperative laparoscopic, or intraductal ultrasound) or to examine the bile ducts with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Endoscopic ultrasonography is reported to have sensitivity in detecting bile duct stones >90% and specificity >95% [52]. Similar values are reported for intraoperative and intraductal ultrasonography [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60].…”
Section: Choledocholithiasissupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However, the entire length of the extra hepatic bile duct is only seen in 60 Á80% of cases [8,9]. TUS for detection of CBD stones has a sensitivity of 55 Á77% and a specificity of 83 Á95% [10]. The wide range of diagnostic values of TUS may be partly explained by its operator dependency and the size of stones in the CBD.…”
Section: Eus Versus Tusmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although numerous etiologies of RUQ pain exist, gallbladder disease (GBD) in the form of biliary colic and cholecystitis are among the most common, affecting roughly 25 million Americans every year and necessitating 600,000 choleycystectomies annually (1,2). The work-up of RUQ pain and the diagnosis of GBD depend heavily on the use of RUQ ultrasound (US), as the clinical and laboratory work-up for GBD has been shown to be inferior to US (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%