2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Despite the voluminous evidence in support of the paradoxical finding that providing individuals with more options can be detrimental to choice, the question of whether and when large assortments impede choice remains open. Even though extant research has identified a variety of antecedents and consequences of choice overload, the findings of the individual studies fail to come together into a cohesive understanding of when large assortments can benefit choice and when they can be detrimental to choice. In a m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
512
0
13

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 568 publications
(544 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
19
512
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In a wellknown study, a tasting booth for jams attracted more people when it offered 24 different options than when it offered 6, but there were more purchases from the set with 6 options than from the set with 24 options [34]. This Bchoice overloadê ffect may however be restricted to situations, in which the consumers are unfamiliar with the options offered [18,54]. More generally, people overestimate the benefits of choice: in deciding how much time they should devote to selecting a better option, they do not incorporate the temporal, cognitive, and emotional costs of searching and of thinking.…”
Section: Costs Of Experiencing Autonomy In Consumer Choicementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a wellknown study, a tasting booth for jams attracted more people when it offered 24 different options than when it offered 6, but there were more purchases from the set with 6 options than from the set with 24 options [34]. This Bchoice overloadê ffect may however be restricted to situations, in which the consumers are unfamiliar with the options offered [18,54]. More generally, people overestimate the benefits of choice: in deciding how much time they should devote to selecting a better option, they do not incorporate the temporal, cognitive, and emotional costs of searching and of thinking.…”
Section: Costs Of Experiencing Autonomy In Consumer Choicementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Information overload in the consumer is triggered by a series of general and specific factors (Chernev, Böckenholt, & Goodman, ; Eppler & Mengis, ). Among the former, of particular importance are personal factors, which include: experience of particular tasks that deliver certain outcomes; skill indicators such as reading speed and speed of analysis; and a person's preferred ways of gathering, organizing, analyzing, or recalling information and experience (i.e., their cognitive style; Jackson & Farzaneh, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex choices can lead to information overload and ultimately demotivation (Bchoice overload^, (Chernev et al 2015). Under a Btoo many choices^condition, individuals become overwhelmed by the number of options and may accept even more the standard option.…”
Section: Limits In Information Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%