The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3313831.3376789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice of Voices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note, however, that our study was adequately powered, and reanalysis of Brouwer’s data leads to the same conclusions. Another limitation connects with used procedure, that is, with use of text-to-speech application (Amazon Polly) that could be perceived as somewhat different than normal human voice (Cambre et al, 2020) and thus, differently affect moral judgements. As we mentioned earlier, used Amazon Polly to avoid problems with accented speech (e.g., Crowther et al, 2016) but this could create other artefacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note, however, that our study was adequately powered, and reanalysis of Brouwer’s data leads to the same conclusions. Another limitation connects with used procedure, that is, with use of text-to-speech application (Amazon Polly) that could be perceived as somewhat different than normal human voice (Cambre et al, 2020) and thus, differently affect moral judgements. As we mentioned earlier, used Amazon Polly to avoid problems with accented speech (e.g., Crowther et al, 2016) but this could create other artefacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used Amazon Polly (a text-to-speech system) to avoid potential problems with accented speech: Such speech is not only more difficult to comprehend (Crowther et al, 2016), but an accented speaker is also judged as less credible (Lev-Ari & Keysar, 2010). Previous research utilising Amazon Polly observed promising results in terms of use Amazon Polly in behavioural research, suggesting that artificial voices sound quite naturally (Jeong et al, 2019), and are rated closely to real human speaker (Cambre et al, 2020). Despite these promising results, some dose of wary has to be adopted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a comparison study, Baird et al [10] found that different humanoid voices were rated at different levels of humanlikeness; the German male voice was rated the least humanlike. Cambre et al [20] similarly discovered that while non-TTS voices were preferred, the relative humanlikeness of the voice could not be used to determine the best voice for long-form content. They concluded that "the variation.…”
Section: Anthropomorphism Humanlikeness and Natural Vs Synthetic Voicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, HCI research often gendered as masculine (e.g., boardgames [117] or e-sports [139]) or feminine (e.g., fertility [43] or makeup [138]) routinely describes the omission of LGBTQ+ people as a limitation of their work. Some mentioned using -and having to justify using -datasets or technologies that only include binary genders, such as voice technology [31,194] and video-gamecharacter-creation tools [49,120,122]. A large body of research, while acknowledging the limitations of their methods, used a binary gender measure to explore gender biases or inequity among researchers themselves [35,68] and in algorithmic [7,17,227] and CSCW [64,74,212] systems.…”
Section: Becoming a Limitation Or Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%