1977
DOI: 10.1080/03057267708559846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice of Science Courses in Secondary School: Trends and Explanations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also seems that the girls who do choose to learn science prefer subjects that are different from those favored by boys. In their studies, Entwistle and Duckworth (1977), Jungwirth (1973), and Tamir (1975) have shown that while boys are more oriented toward the so-called "hard" sciences (physics, chemistry, etc. ), girls prefer the "soft" subjects such as human physiology, plant life, zoology, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also seems that the girls who do choose to learn science prefer subjects that are different from those favored by boys. In their studies, Entwistle and Duckworth (1977), Jungwirth (1973), and Tamir (1975) have shown that while boys are more oriented toward the so-called "hard" sciences (physics, chemistry, etc. ), girls prefer the "soft" subjects such as human physiology, plant life, zoology, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a general pattern, Patrick (1980) concluded that all age groups studied in the NAEP report, ranked science subjects low in relation to career interests and other courses in school. Armstrong (1973), Creaper (1976), Entwistle and Duckworth (1977), and Lazarowitz and Hertz-Lazarowitz (1979) advocated that students have a voice in choosing what they study and also that the reasons for students' choices should be studied. Students' interest in science, choice of science subjects, and reasons for these preferences were studied in relation to the option of further science courses, (Butler 1968, Ormerod andDuckworth 1975) to socio-environmental factors, to students' background and parental influences, (Krippner 1963, andRoe 1963), to gender (Lowery 1967) to school type (whether simple-sex or coeducational) by Ormerod (1975), and to achievement and vocational choice (Sjoberg 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are painfully few role models for them to identify with. Teachers can serve as role models for many students (Entwistle & Duckworth, 1977), but science teachers are usually male and this situation is exaggerated in the advanced sciences. Also, since the majority of science students are male, girls would not have the support of their peer group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%