Abstract:This study aims to understand the street-crossing-facility choice behavior of the elderly. The footbridges were classified into three types with different levels of convenience. On the other hand, the safety of the crosswalk was assumed to be highly related to the remaining time of pedestrian green light. An adaptive SP survey was designed to collect choice data from individuals aged 60 years or above, and a multilevel logistic model was developed to analyze the behavior data. The results indicated that conven… Show more
“… Wei et al (2018) showed participants a sequence of videos and asked them to choose whether they would use a crosswalk or a crossing bridge ( Wei et al, 2018 ). The crosswalk included a pedestrian countdown device and the amount of time remaining was manipulated along with the accessibility of the crossing bridge.…”
Section: Summary Of Papers and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the speed limit was 70 km/hr, 84% of pedestrians used the overpass ( Alver & Onelcin, 2018 ). Therefore, it is possible that the presence of the signalized crosswalk in the Wei et al (2018) study made the overpass less appealing due to an apparently “safe” method of crossing.…”
Section: Summary Of Papers and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental factors that decreased the probability of having an interaction were the presence of a one-way street, crossings with a different surface material, and the presence of a curb extension (Cloutier et al, 2017). Wei et al (2018) showed participants a sequence of videos and asked them to choose whether they would use a crosswalk or a crossing bridge (Wei et al, 2018). The crosswalk included a pedestrian countdown device and the amount of time remaining was manipulated along with the accessibility of the crossing bridge.…”
Section: Crossing At Signalized Crossingsmentioning
Objective To explore factors that could explain why older adults are more at risk at the roadside. Background The physical and psychological health benefits of walking have been well-established, leading to the widespread promotion of walking amongst older adults. However, walking can result in an increased risk of injury as a pedestrian at the roadside, which is a greater risk for older adults who are overrepresented in pedestrian casualty figures. Method Relevant databases were searched up to January 2020. All peer-reviewed journals that presented data on healthy older adults and some aspect of road crossing or roadside behavior were included. A total of 142 papers were assessed and 60 met the inclusion criteria. Results Identified papers could be grouped into three areas: crossing at a designated crossing place; crossing with no designated crossing place; perceptions or behaviors. Conclusion Multiple individual (attitudes, perceived behavioral control, walking time, time-to-arrival judgments, waiting endurance, cognitive ability), task (vehicle size, vehicle speed, traffic volume), and environmental (road layout, time of day, weather) constraints influence road crossing in older adulthood. Application Accessibility of designated crossing areas needs to be addressed by ensuring sufficient time to cross and nonrestrictive waiting times. Signalized crossings need to be simplified and visibility increased. Where there is no designated crossing place, a reduction in speed limit alongside the provision of pedestrian islands to provide “pause” places are needed. Educational-based programs may also help ensure safety of older adults where there is no designated crossing place.
“… Wei et al (2018) showed participants a sequence of videos and asked them to choose whether they would use a crosswalk or a crossing bridge ( Wei et al, 2018 ). The crosswalk included a pedestrian countdown device and the amount of time remaining was manipulated along with the accessibility of the crossing bridge.…”
Section: Summary Of Papers and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the speed limit was 70 km/hr, 84% of pedestrians used the overpass ( Alver & Onelcin, 2018 ). Therefore, it is possible that the presence of the signalized crosswalk in the Wei et al (2018) study made the overpass less appealing due to an apparently “safe” method of crossing.…”
Section: Summary Of Papers and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental factors that decreased the probability of having an interaction were the presence of a one-way street, crossings with a different surface material, and the presence of a curb extension (Cloutier et al, 2017). Wei et al (2018) showed participants a sequence of videos and asked them to choose whether they would use a crosswalk or a crossing bridge (Wei et al, 2018). The crosswalk included a pedestrian countdown device and the amount of time remaining was manipulated along with the accessibility of the crossing bridge.…”
Section: Crossing At Signalized Crossingsmentioning
Objective To explore factors that could explain why older adults are more at risk at the roadside. Background The physical and psychological health benefits of walking have been well-established, leading to the widespread promotion of walking amongst older adults. However, walking can result in an increased risk of injury as a pedestrian at the roadside, which is a greater risk for older adults who are overrepresented in pedestrian casualty figures. Method Relevant databases were searched up to January 2020. All peer-reviewed journals that presented data on healthy older adults and some aspect of road crossing or roadside behavior were included. A total of 142 papers were assessed and 60 met the inclusion criteria. Results Identified papers could be grouped into three areas: crossing at a designated crossing place; crossing with no designated crossing place; perceptions or behaviors. Conclusion Multiple individual (attitudes, perceived behavioral control, walking time, time-to-arrival judgments, waiting endurance, cognitive ability), task (vehicle size, vehicle speed, traffic volume), and environmental (road layout, time of day, weather) constraints influence road crossing in older adulthood. Application Accessibility of designated crossing areas needs to be addressed by ensuring sufficient time to cross and nonrestrictive waiting times. Signalized crossings need to be simplified and visibility increased. Where there is no designated crossing place, a reduction in speed limit alongside the provision of pedestrian islands to provide “pause” places are needed. Educational-based programs may also help ensure safety of older adults where there is no designated crossing place.
“…With an aging baby boomer population, elderly mobility is becoming an increasingly important social issue, which has aroused great interest in the research community. In recent years, researchers have studied the issue of elderly mobility from various perspectives, including public transit accessibility [28,29], pedestrian environment [30,31], driving behaviors [32,33], and crossing road intersections [34,35], among many others. Some of these studies have also reported many beneficial findings on the differences between elderly users in the different parts of the world.…”
This study deals with the elderly fare pricing issue for taking express buses in the morning peak period. As many elderly passengers are not commuters, fare discount policy may not be an opportune option when buses get overcrowded. Imposing surcharge on the elderly becomes a potentially beneficial measure that encourages an appropriate number of elderly passengers to circumvent the most crowded buses. The elderly pricing surcharge problem is formulated as a bilevel model, in which the upper-level model is to make the pricing surcharge decision, and the lower-level model is the equilibrium passenger assignment that represents passengers’ bus choice behavior. It is classified into the special case and the generic case depending on the number of buses that impose surcharge. Several useful properties of two cases are analyzed, and a trial-and-error solution method is later developed to solve these two cases. Numerical experiments show that the elderly pricing surcharge scheme is not always applicable to all the demand scenarios, which owns a certain effective interval.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.