1968
DOI: 10.1126/science.159.3822.1487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorpromazine: Direct Measurement of Differential Behavioral Effect

Abstract: A retarded child with a high stereotyped rocking rate was conditioned to pull a ball on a reinforcement schedule in which the fixed ratio aof rewarded to nonrewarded responses was 100. Results show no rocking movements during ball-pulling; but when ball-pulling was on extinction, rocking returned to its original rate. Chlorpromazine blocked rocking movements during extinction, but had no effect on ball-pulling. Delivery of one free reinforcer was sufficient to reinstate ball-pulling after extinction, but the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A within-subject reversal design was used. These designs have proven productive in laboratory psychopharmacological studies with animals (e.g., Dews, 1971;Laties & Weiss, 1969;Thompson & Schuster, 1968) and in clinical studies with humans (e.g., Ayllon, Layman, & Kandel, 1975;Christensen, 1975;Hollis, 1968;Liberman, Davis, Moon, & Moore, 1973). Within-subject comparisons are particularly important in the study of drugs on behavior (Liberman & Davis, 1975) because, as Sulzbacher (1972) and Sprague and Sleator (1975) have pointed out, each person may react to medication idiosyncratically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A within-subject reversal design was used. These designs have proven productive in laboratory psychopharmacological studies with animals (e.g., Dews, 1971;Laties & Weiss, 1969;Thompson & Schuster, 1968) and in clinical studies with humans (e.g., Ayllon, Layman, & Kandel, 1975;Christensen, 1975;Hollis, 1968;Liberman, Davis, Moon, & Moore, 1973). Within-subject comparisons are particularly important in the study of drugs on behavior (Liberman & Davis, 1975) because, as Sulzbacher (1972) and Sprague and Sleator (1975) have pointed out, each person may react to medication idiosyncratically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thorazine, in turn, eliminated rocking responses in the brief extinction period. In a study of two retardates, Baumeister and Forehand (1971) supported Hollis's (1968) finding that self-stimulation was eliminated during brief operant reinforcement sessions, but another report (Hollis, 1 1973, 6, 1-14 NUMBER 1 (SPRING 1973) unpublished) showed that this displacement by operant reinforcement was not effective for three of six retardates. Davis, Sprague, and Werry (1969) found that another tranquilizer (Thoridozine) decreased by about one-third the self-stimulatory behavior of institutionalized retardates.…”
Section: Reducing Self-stimulatory Behaviormentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Mulhern and Baumeister (1969) reduced by about one-third the "rocking" behavior of two retardates by reinforcing the behavior of sitting still. Hollis (1968) conditioned a selfstimulating retardate to pull a ball under fixedratio reinforcement (FR 100). The self-stimulation was eliminated for the brief 10-min periods during ball-pulling but returned to its original rate under an extinction condition.…”
Section: Reducing Self-stimulatory Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is experimental evidence that such children may respond positively to drug therapy, for example with chlorpromazine (Hollis 1968).…”
Section: Specijic Clinical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%