2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorination and bromination of 1,3-diphenylguanidine and 1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine: Kinetics, transformation products and toxicity assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the current intensity from 0.05 A to 0.15 A resulted in an increase in the N TOT removal rate. This achievement can be explained by considering a faster production of hydroxyl radicals and reactive chlorine species, as stated in several previous studies on electrochemical oxidation processes [ 77 ], which favor the oxidation of the organic compounds, i.e., the achievement of higher removal efficiencies. On the other hand, over time of treatment, the reactive chlorine species present in the solution can lead to the formation of undesired byproducts, such as chlorate and perchlorate, among others, which may hinder further oxidation of the contaminant at the BDD anode [ 62 , 63 , 64 ], justifying the constant removal efficiency after 90 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Increasing the current intensity from 0.05 A to 0.15 A resulted in an increase in the N TOT removal rate. This achievement can be explained by considering a faster production of hydroxyl radicals and reactive chlorine species, as stated in several previous studies on electrochemical oxidation processes [ 77 ], which favor the oxidation of the organic compounds, i.e., the achievement of higher removal efficiencies. On the other hand, over time of treatment, the reactive chlorine species present in the solution can lead to the formation of undesired byproducts, such as chlorate and perchlorate, among others, which may hinder further oxidation of the contaminant at the BDD anode [ 62 , 63 , 64 ], justifying the constant removal efficiency after 90 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Much less is known about likely effects of these on duckweed. General toxicity of the transformation products of 1,3diphenylguanidine is expected across organisms (Sieira et al, 2020), and the same is true for benzothiazole, with documented toxicity across a number of other species, and potential similar mode of action as PAHs, due to activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptors (Liao et al, 2018). Bisphenol-A toxicity to duckweed and other Lemna is known (Mihaich et al, 2009;Fekete-Kertész et al, 2015), and like PAHs may increase growth at low concentrations (Mihaich et al, 2009).…”
Section: Microbiome Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DPG was recently reported to occur in runoff water from roads [44,45], pointing to tire crumb rubber as a potential source of this compound in surface water. Although both DTG and DPG have been observed to be transformed by chlorination [46], or, in the case of DPG, also through solar radiation [5], their presence in the environment or ecotoxicological effects have scarcely been studied.…”
Section: Overview On the Most Frequently Detected Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%