2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorhexidine 2% and choice of transparent dressing increase skin reactions at central venous catheter insertion sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a commonly used antiseptic agent, CHG has been used in intensive care units (ICU) for routine daily care, and its use has been shown to decrease the incidence of CRBSI. [6163] Some studies have shown that CHG-impregnated dressings reduce the incidence of CRBSI. [62,64,65] The study by Karpanen suggested that CHG-impregnated dressings have detectable antimicrobial activity for up to 7 days, and the sustained release of CHG from the dressing increases with time, which may reduce the microbial load at the catheter insertion site, thereby reducing the risk of CRBSI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a commonly used antiseptic agent, CHG has been used in intensive care units (ICU) for routine daily care, and its use has been shown to decrease the incidence of CRBSI. [6163] Some studies have shown that CHG-impregnated dressings reduce the incidence of CRBSI. [62,64,65] The study by Karpanen suggested that CHG-impregnated dressings have detectable antimicrobial activity for up to 7 days, and the sustained release of CHG from the dressing increases with time, which may reduce the microbial load at the catheter insertion site, thereby reducing the risk of CRBSI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cutaneous toxicity of chlorhexidine has mainly been observed during repeated applications in neonates (impregnated dressings) [222]. In a study of chlorhexidine dressings in a population of adults and children, the 2% concentration was shown to be more aggressive than 0.5% [223]. Finally, in the study conducted by Mimoz et al higher rates of skin reactions were observed with chlorhexidine than with povidone [26].…”
Section: Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%