2005
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-03-0325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlamydial Antibodies and Risk of Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
26
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(40 reference statements)
5
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…trachomatis Infection. Our null finding for C. trachomatis antibody seropositivity is consistent with findings from one previous nested case-control study (15) but differs from those from two additional studies, one of which observed a significant inverse association between C. trachomatis antibody seropositivity and prostate cancer across three study sites (22), whereas the other observed a suggestion of an inverse association between self-reported history of chlamydia and prostate cancer (23). Findings from the second study, however, are difficult to interpret because of the low reported cumulative incidence of chlamydia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…trachomatis Infection. Our null finding for C. trachomatis antibody seropositivity is consistent with findings from one previous nested case-control study (15) but differs from those from two additional studies, one of which observed a significant inverse association between C. trachomatis antibody seropositivity and prostate cancer across three study sites (22), whereas the other observed a suggestion of an inverse association between self-reported history of chlamydia and prostate cancer (23). Findings from the second study, however, are difficult to interpret because of the low reported cumulative incidence of chlamydia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our observed C. trachomatis seroprevalence of 3.5% to 4.0% is lower than previously published estimates, many of which were estimated in general male Scandinavian populations ranging in age from 18 to 97 years (15,22,29) and were based on use of the microimmunofluorescence assay, which is considered to be a more specific but less sensitive test than the Ani Labsystems enzyme immunoassay used in our study (28,(37)(38)(39). To our knowledge, no estimates of C. trachomatis seroprevalence exist in the general male U.S. population, either based on the microimmunofluorescence assay or enzyme immunoassay, to allow for comparisons between men from the same geographic location.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent study conducted in the U.S. military, a suggestive positive association was observed for C. trachomatis seropositivity using serum specimens collected at least five years before diagnosis, but not using specimens collected closer to diagnosis [73]. However, as null or inverse associations were observed in other studies with early specimen collection [63,89], this recent sub-group finding may have been observed by chance. Other possible exceptions include the suggestive positive associations observed for selfreported history of chlamydia and prostate cancer among Asian-American and Latino men in the California Men's Health Study [57].…”
Section: Chlamydia Trachomatis Infectionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Initially, this STI was included in investigations of prostate cancer risk as a marker of sexual activity [63]; however, it has since been investigated in relation to prostate cancer in its own right because of its known ability to cause chronic, persistent infections, and asymptomatic and symptomatic prostate inflammation in some men [ [56,58,89] and references therein]. Despite this promising rationale, most studies to date have observed generally null or occasionally inverse associations between a history of chlamydia and prostate cancer, irrespective of the study design, method of assessment (serology or self-report), type of C. trachomatis antibody assay used (enzyme immunoassay or micro-immunofluorescence assay), and timing of specimen collection if assessed by serology [42, 56-58, 63, 73, 89] (Table 5).…”
Section: Chlamydia Trachomatis Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%