2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40204-021-00172-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan-coated pore wall polycaprolactone three-dimensional porous scaffolds fabricated by porogen leaching method for bone tissue engineering: a comparative study on blending technique to fabricate scaffolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are many scaffold fabrication techniques like emulsion freeze drying ( Sultana and Wang, 2008 ; Qian and Zhang, 2011 ; Sultana and Wang, 2012 ), gas foaming ( Manavitehrani et al, 2019 ; Luo et al, 2021 ; Chen Y et al, 2021 ), porogen leaching ( Bhaskar et al, 2018 ; Poddar et al, 2021 ; Santos-Rosales et al, 2021 ) or phase separation ( Ferrolino et al, 2018 ; Abzan et al, 2019 ; Zeinali et al, 2021 ), more recently additive manufacturing (AM) gained an increased interest for scaffold fabrication ( Shick et al, 2019 ; Szymczyk-Ziółkowska et al, 2020 ; Veeman et al, 2021 ). Generally, the term AM refers to a group of additive manufacturing techniques used to produce a scale model of a physical part or assembly as a three-dimensional model as quickly and inexpensively as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are many scaffold fabrication techniques like emulsion freeze drying ( Sultana and Wang, 2008 ; Qian and Zhang, 2011 ; Sultana and Wang, 2012 ), gas foaming ( Manavitehrani et al, 2019 ; Luo et al, 2021 ; Chen Y et al, 2021 ), porogen leaching ( Bhaskar et al, 2018 ; Poddar et al, 2021 ; Santos-Rosales et al, 2021 ) or phase separation ( Ferrolino et al, 2018 ; Abzan et al, 2019 ; Zeinali et al, 2021 ), more recently additive manufacturing (AM) gained an increased interest for scaffold fabrication ( Shick et al, 2019 ; Szymczyk-Ziółkowska et al, 2020 ; Veeman et al, 2021 ). Generally, the term AM refers to a group of additive manufacturing techniques used to produce a scale model of a physical part or assembly as a three-dimensional model as quickly and inexpensively as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the hemolysis ratio of the dGQH scaffolds (dGQH 20 : 0.65 ± 0.35% dGQH 30 : 0.43 ± 0.17%, dGQH 40 : 0.16 ± 0.29%) were less than 1%, which were much lower than that of dGQ scaffold (1.72 ± 0.57%) (figure 5(H)). Many bone-tissue scaffolds had been reported that the hemolysis ratios were higher than 2% [79][80][81][82], even though the acceptable range is less than 5% [83,84]. In contrast, the hemolysis ratios of the dGQH scaffolds in this study were all much less than 1%, which demonstrated that the dGQH scaffolds had excellent hemocompatibility for bone tissue engineering.…”
Section: Hydrophilicity Degradation and Hemocompatibility Of The Scaf...mentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Further, the 20% w/v PMS was physically mixed with CHA mixture and molded into 3D scaffolds using the already mentioned syringe molding technique. [ 40 ] In brief, the chitosan and MALD suspension was placed in an 8 mm diameter syringe with the removed end of the needle and fixed with nylon filter paper (pore sizes of 50 µm) at the syringe head, the piston was gently pushed down to extrude the chitosan solution from the syringe, and scaffolds were removed when no more extraction of the solution was observed and dried in a vacuum oven at 37 °C for 48 h. As a second step, CHA‐coated PMS scaffolds were immersed in PCL solution (10% w/v in acetone) and held and reserved at a low vacuum for 48 h to fill the interstitial of the layer with PCL solution. Next, the scaffolds were removed from the PCL solution and washed with 1–4 dioxane to remove any excess PCL solution from the surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%