Chirurgie laparoscopique par accès unique : expérience initiale

Poizac, S.; Estrade, J.-P.; Marcelli, M.; Lazard, A.; Cravello, L.; Blanc, B.; Gamerre, M.; Agostini, Aubert

doi:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.08.027

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An infant with single‐portal ovary cystectomy has been reported at the beginning of this century 9 . At present, SPL has been applied to various types of surgery including gynaecological and urological 10–16 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…9 At present, SPL has been applied to various types of surgery including gynaecological and urological. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] A number of studies have demonstrated that this technology is feasible in appendage surgery. [17][18][19] Recent success in the treatment of a benign tumour with a single-port laparoscopic operation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 9 At present, SPL has been applied to various types of surgery including gynaecological and urological. 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of two different laparoscopic techniques on post‐operative wound complications in patients with benign gynaecological diseases: A meta‐analysis

He,

Li,

Cui

et al. 2023

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Single‐port laparoscopy (SPL) has existed for several years. This meta‐analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of SPL compared with conventional laparoscopy (CL) in the treatment of benign gynecologic adnexal lesions. The purpose of this meta‐analysis is to evaluate the superiority of SPL versus CL in the treatment of post‐operative wound pain. The study looked for English‐language publications from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and the Web of Science until June 2023. The main result was the visual analogue scale (VAS) after 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after operation. The paper contains 10 related papers by means of e‐search. Of these, 4 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while 6 were non‐RCTs. The results indicated that SPL and CL were significantly different after 2, 24 and 48 h after operation. SPL had lower post‐operative pain after 2 h compared with CL (MD, −0.6; 95% CI, −0.98, −0.21; p = 0.002). After the operation, SPL also had a lower incidence of post‐operative pain after 24 h compared with CL (MD, −0.59; 95% CI, −1.12, −0.06; p = 0.03). And the difference in pain was at 48 h after the most significant (MD, −0.49; 95% CI, −0.75, −0.23; p = 0.0002). But after 6, 8 and 12 h after operation, there was no significant difference in the degree of pain. Thus, SPL operations may result in a lower degree of pain than CL in both the post‐operative and far post‐operative phase.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%