2007
DOI: 10.1121/1.2794881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chirp zeta transform beamforming for three-dimensional acoustic imaging

Abstract: This letter considers the possibility of the generation of three-dimensional acoustic images with a limited computational load by considering the extension of Chirp zeta transform beam forming to the case of planar array and near-field conditions. This extension, with a few innovative solutions, allows for a dramatic reduction in the number of on-line operations over traditional time-domain beamforming.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the signal distortion is high relative to that of the 2D FIR trapezoidal filter beamformer. Even though more computationally efficient algorithms are proposed in [16,21], in general DFT-based broadband beamforming methods have drawbacks, such as the requirement of higher data storage and higher latency.…”
Section: A Brief Comparison Of Temporally Broadband-bandpass Beamformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the signal distortion is high relative to that of the 2D FIR trapezoidal filter beamformer. Even though more computationally efficient algorithms are proposed in [16,21], in general DFT-based broadband beamforming methods have drawbacks, such as the requirement of higher data storage and higher latency.…”
Section: A Brief Comparison Of Temporally Broadband-bandpass Beamformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previously proposed discrete-domain broadband-beamforming methods for processing PWs employ either frequency-domain or time-domain methods. The frequency-domain methods [4,16,21] typically evaluate the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of a 2D segment of the space-time (ST) sampled signal. However, the higher latency of such frequency-domain methods is not well suited to real-time adaptive applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%