1982
DOI: 10.1002/9780470147221.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral Monolayers at the Air‐Water Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 192 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Moreover, it has been predicted that 2D enantioseparation on a surface should occur more easily than in three-dimensional (3D) crystals. 13 Because of confinement in the plane certain symmetry elements, like center of inversion or the glide plane parallel to the surface, are precluded, 14 and a higher probability for spontaneous resolution is therefore expected. 15 Here we present a STM study on the 2D crystallization of the chiral aromatic hydrocarbon heptahelicene (Figure 1, C 30 H 18 , [7]H) on a Cu(111) surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Moreover, it has been predicted that 2D enantioseparation on a surface should occur more easily than in three-dimensional (3D) crystals. 13 Because of confinement in the plane certain symmetry elements, like center of inversion or the glide plane parallel to the surface, are precluded, 14 and a higher probability for spontaneous resolution is therefore expected. 15 Here we present a STM study on the 2D crystallization of the chiral aromatic hydrocarbon heptahelicene (Figure 1, C 30 H 18 , [7]H) on a Cu(111) surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of twodimensional chiral space groups (five chiral space groups of the 17 available, 29.4%) is very similar to that in three-dimensional (3D) systems (65 space groups of the 230 available, 28.3%), but the spontaneous separation of enantiomers of both chiral and achiral molecules at ordered surfaces is frequent [26,27]. This situation can be rationalized by taking into account the mutual symmetry relations that adsorbate and surface must satisfy [28,29]. A molecule confined in a monolayer on a surface cannot be related to another by inversion symmetry, and the glide plane parallel to the surface is similarly excluded.…”
Section: Chiral Monolayersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous alternatives arise when molecules that are chiral in 2D are adsorbed on surfaces. Earlier studies of this phenomenon have suggested that racemic crystals are less predominant in 2D than in 3D, , but no clear consensus about the generality of these data has emerged, and the reasons for significantly different behavior in 2D and 3D have not been fully delineated. Molecular chirality has widespread consequences in nature, and adsorption on surfaces to create chiral patterns may have been a critical step in the origin of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%