2018
DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s174293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic for discrimination among different severities of Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract: ObjectivesTo find out whether the Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic (MoCA-BC) and its subtests could be applied in discrimination among cognitively normal controls (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), mild and moderate Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), and furthermore, to determine the optimal cutoffs most sensitive to distinguish between them.DesignA cross-sectional validation study.SettingHuashan Hospital, Shanghai, China.ParticipantsThere was a total of 1,969 participants: individuals with MC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
41
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort, MoCA scores were low in all four groups. However, several Chinese validation studies of the application of MoCA to identify patients with dementia showed lower thresholds than those found in international populations, due to the differences in regional culture and level of education, especially in older patients (Zheng et al, 2012;Huang et al, 2018). The MoCA scores in our study were similar to the data in the above Chinese studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In our cohort, MoCA scores were low in all four groups. However, several Chinese validation studies of the application of MoCA to identify patients with dementia showed lower thresholds than those found in international populations, due to the differences in regional culture and level of education, especially in older patients (Zheng et al, 2012;Huang et al, 2018). The MoCA scores in our study were similar to the data in the above Chinese studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In addition, many studies have shown the distinction between SCD and MCI or AD, by using these neuropsychological assessments, such as MoCA, CDT and AVLT (Fernaeus et al, 2014; Zhao et al, 2015; Vyhnalek et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2019). Their high sensitivity and specificity have also been reported previously, suggesting that those assessments were able to distinguish SCD from MCI and AD (Vyhnalek et al, 2014; Huang et al, 2018; Park et al, 2018; Xu et al, 2018). However, little is known about the diagnostic power of these tools in discriminating SCD ( plus ) and NC.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, when screening for MCI or AD, the AUC for the delayed recall test was the largest, which is more conducive to the early recognition of cognitive dysfunction in MCI or AD patients. This is similar to the previous studies by Lin Huang [11] et al The memory index score of the MoCA-BC had high sensitivity and specificity for MCI screening, while the non-memory index score of the MoCA-BC had similar effectiveness for discrimination among MCI, mild AD and moderate AD groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The cutoff points to detect MCI or AD have been demonstrated to be different all over the world [6–9]. The Chinese version of the MoCA-B (MoCA-BC), translated with cultural modifications from the original English version, has shown excellent validity and accuracy in distinguishing between NC, MCI, mild and moderate AD among the Chinese elderly with various levels of education [10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%