Chinese computational propaganda: automation, algorithms and the manipulation of information about Chinese politics on Twitter and Weibo

Abstract

A 2016 review of literature about automation, algorithms and politics identified China as the foremost area in which further research was needed because of the size of its population, the potential for Chinese algorithmic manipulation in the politics of other countries, and the frequency of exportation of Chinese software and hardware. This paper contributes to the small body of knowledge on the first point (domestic automation and opinion manipulation) and presents the first piece of research into the second (international automation and opinion manipulation). Findings are based on an analysis of 1.5 million comments on official political information posts on Weibo and 1.1 million posts using hashtags associated with China and Chinese politics on Twitter. In line with previous research, little evidence of automation was found on Weibo. In contrast, a large amount of automaton was found on Twitter. However, contrary to expectations and previous news reports, no evidence was found of pro-Chinese state automaton on Twitter. Automation on Twitter was associated with anti-Chinese state perspectives and published in simplified Mandarin, presumably aimed at diasporic Chinese and mainland users who Ôjump the wallÕ to access blocked platforms. These users come to Twitter seeking more diverse information and an online public sphere but instead they find an information environment in which a small number of anti-Chinese state voices are attempting to use automation to dominate discourse. Our understanding of public conversation on Twitter in Mandarin is extremely limited and, thus, this paper advances the understanding of political communication on social media.

Engagement or control? The impact of the Chinese environmental protection bureaus’ burgeoning online presence in local environmental governance

“…These behaviours could be explained by institutional factors listed by Zheng (2013): first, the fact that the Province evaluates the prefectures on the basis of quantitative criteria may have encouraged 'box-ticking' attitudes, as well as, in some cases, the use of artificial means to improve scores. This use of artificial means to boost quantitative metrics of audience engagement corroborates the growing body of research concerning the increasing manipulation of the online information environment (Bolsover and Howard, 2018) and supports ideas that quantitative performance assessment in government service provision produce distorted incentives and maladaptive behaviours that have a negative impact on information disclosure (Zhang and Chen 2015). Second, EPB's online behaviours may be explained as a reaction to the attempt by the province EPB to use Weibo to supervise them.…”

Online Dialogue and Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use of Twitter Affordances to Dissolve Online Criticism

“…Other research has contributed to the growing interest in "domestic and international automation, combined with opinion manipulation" (Bolsover & Howard, 2019). While others, pioneering in analyzing social media use for state-sponsored oppression, have discovered how new communication online environments provided by social media could promote total state control (Gunitsky, 2015).…”

Why are some websites researched more than others? A review of researh into the global top twenty

“…Social scientists therefore need to understand how it affects people's lives. For example, an inability to access websites can cause problems in richer nations (Dutton; Reisdorf, 2019), knowledge of usage patterns can help marketing initiatives (Mariani;Di-Felice;Mura, 2016), and investigations of social network sites are important to understand modern political movements (Bolsover;Howard, 2019). Websites offer many different affordances and it is important to investigate the most popular sites and genres so that their individual values can be known.…”