2002
DOI: 10.1080/10736700208436872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

China's role in the chemical and biological disarmament regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether it is the prevalence of HIV/ AIDS among the Chinese population, foot-and-mouth disease in domestic Chinese livestock (referred to officially as ''disease no. 5''), or the recent outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) virus, there is a past history of reticence on the part of Chinese authorities to be transparent concerning outbreaks of infectious disease and other public health problems (Croddy 2002). Therefore, open-source data on rodenticide poisonings in China may be erring on the very low side.…”
Section: Rodenticides and Mass Poisonings In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether it is the prevalence of HIV/ AIDS among the Chinese population, foot-and-mouth disease in domestic Chinese livestock (referred to officially as ''disease no. 5''), or the recent outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) virus, there is a past history of reticence on the part of Chinese authorities to be transparent concerning outbreaks of infectious disease and other public health problems (Croddy 2002). Therefore, open-source data on rodenticide poisonings in China may be erring on the very low side.…”
Section: Rodenticides and Mass Poisonings In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The United States [6], the former Soviet Union [7,8], and China [9,10] have all examined C. psittaci for use as a biological weapon. Rear Admiral (Ret) Ellis Zacharias stated during the 1940's that biological weapons at that time included "bacteriological bombs containing either botulinus toxin or psittacosis virus (It should be noted that in our current understanding the term 'virus' was incorrectly applied in this context 76 years ago.)"…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%