2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

China's forest tenure reform and institutional change in the new century: What has been implemented and what remains to be pursued?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, similar policies, named "the Three Fixes", were not implemented thoroughly in China's forestry sector, partly due to ecological considerations [2]. The forestry productivity has been severely impeded by institutional and regulatory barriers [3]. Therefore, a new round of tenure reform was initiated on collective forestland around 2003 [4], known as the collective forest tenure reform (CFTR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, similar policies, named "the Three Fixes", were not implemented thoroughly in China's forestry sector, partly due to ecological considerations [2]. The forestry productivity has been severely impeded by institutional and regulatory barriers [3]. Therefore, a new round of tenure reform was initiated on collective forestland around 2003 [4], known as the collective forest tenure reform (CFTR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local forest transaction centers have also been set up to facilitate the transfer of forestland and the sale of timber [47].…”
Section: Collective Forest Tenure Reforms In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Households had to apply for cutting permits for trees on their contracted forestland, and after cutting, farmers could only sell to the state procurement agency at low and planned prices set by the government [31]. In addition, high stumpage taxes and fees were collected from households and their communities to fund the reforestation activities [5]. After the Three Fixes reform, about 70% of collective forestland was allocated to households, however, this transfer was somehow ostensible and the control was actually held by collective villages [32].…”
Section: Historical Evolvement Of China's Forestland Tenurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, public transaction platforms or forestland-based asset evaluation agencies have been established. All these actions would facilitate forestland transactions [4,5]. Table 3 reports the estimation results of the standard Tobit model (not addressing endogeneity), a standard linear IV model with panel data (not addressing censoring), and a standard linear model with panel data (neither addressing endogeneity nor censoring).…”
Section: The Cftr Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation