1999
DOI: 10.1080/87565649909540742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children with williams syndrome: Is there a single neuropsychological profile?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
61
3
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
61
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also different cognitive profi les were described in participants with comparable intellectual defi cits or even with the same aetiology (Vicari, Albertini & Caltagirone, 1992;Pezzini et al, 1999). All these observations seem to support a theoretical approach that considers intellectual disabilities not as a mere slowing of normal cognitive development, but as distinct, individual profi les, that can be qualitatively specifi ed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also different cognitive profi les were described in participants with comparable intellectual defi cits or even with the same aetiology (Vicari, Albertini & Caltagirone, 1992;Pezzini et al, 1999). All these observations seem to support a theoretical approach that considers intellectual disabilities not as a mere slowing of normal cognitive development, but as distinct, individual profi les, that can be qualitatively specifi ed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Children with Williams syndrome often show marked impairment in certain visual-spatial abilities (especially praxic-constructive) and relative preservation of both productive and receptive language, at least concerning the phonological elements (Volterra, Capirci, Pezzini, Sabbadini & Vicari, 1996;Pezzini, Vicari, Volterra, Milani & Ossella, 1999). Also different cognitive profi les were described in participants with comparable intellectual defi cits or even with the same aetiology (Vicari, Albertini & Caltagirone, 1992;Pezzini et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methodological challenges include: the focus on group averages despite extensive cognitive heterogeneity in WS (Pezzini, Vicari, Voltera, Milani, & Ossella, 1999;Porter & Coltheart, 2005); the need to consider regression to the mean, the phenomenon whereby extreme scores are more likely to change over time (revert closer to the mean) than scores that are less extreme; and standard error of measurement (whether significant changes in scores are clinically meaningful or reflect statistical error).…”
Section: Other Methodological Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that the reduced frequency effect in WS might be the result of a rigid use of a phonological encoding strategy for both high and low frequency words and propose that people with WS might be "hyper-phonological". The authors relate this pattern of results to WS linguistic abilities where there is some evidence for a pattern of well-preserved phonology coupled with impairments in lexical-semantics and syntax (Capirci et al, 1996;Pezzini et al, 1999;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also some evidence for differences in the processing of concrete and abstract items at the neurological level (Breedin et al, 1994;Weiss and Rappelsberger, 1996). Concrete words are thought to be 'richer' in terms of the number of features that define them (Plaut and Shallice, 1993) This 'richness' may explain concreteness effects in short-term memory. Recent studies have demonstrated that both normal children (Nation et al, 1999) and adults (Walker and Hulme, 1999) recall concrete words more easily than abstract words.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%