2011
DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2010.549872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Abilities in Williams Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
36
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
11
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Profiles and Development of Adaptive Behavior in Adolescents and Adults with Williams Syndrome strengths and weaknesses in WS were consistent, at least on those abilities assessed using the WJ-R COG [24].…”
Section: Trista Juhsin Fumentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Profiles and Development of Adaptive Behavior in Adolescents and Adults with Williams Syndrome strengths and weaknesses in WS were consistent, at least on those abilities assessed using the WJ-R COG [24].…”
Section: Trista Juhsin Fumentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In contrast to the preceding studies which included only child participants, the participants in the remaining study spanned a very broad age range. Porter and Dodd [] used the Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability‐Revised [WJ‐R; Woodcock and Johnson, ] to assess the overall IQ and Cognitive Factor SSs of 27 individuals with WS at two time points about five years apart. The participants' CA at Time 1 ranged from 5.00–44.67 years with a mean of 16.16 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though cognitive abilities range from moderate intellectual disability to average, WS is usually associated with mild to moderate cognitive impairment with typical IQ in the 50s–60s (e.g., Bellugi et al, 2000; see Martens et al, 2008 for a review). IQ appears to be relatively stable with age (Howlin et al, 1998; Porter and Dodd, 2011; Mervis et al, 2012) with greater verbal than spatial abilities (Bellugi et al, 1994). Receptive language abilities appear to be a relative strength in WS while other aspects of language are consistent with their cognitive profile (Brock, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%