2019
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children With Dyslexia and Familial Risk for Dyslexia Present Atypical Development of the Neuronal Phonological Network

Abstract: Learning to read changes the brain language system. Phonological processing is the language domain most crucial for reading, but it is still unknown how reading acquisition modifies the neural phonological network in children who either develop dyslexia or are at risk of dyslexia. For the two first years of formal education, we followed 90 beginning readers with (n = 55) and without (n = 35) familial risk of dyslexia who became typical readers (n = 70) or developed dyslexia (n = 20). We used functional magneti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For phonological skills acquired earlier than reading, the development of associated phonological networks was delayed in poor reading children. The bilateral STG, left middle temporal gyrus, right insula, and frontal cortex were engaged by typical readers during auditory rhyming at the beginning of formal education and by dyslexic readers two years later 48 . Similarly, a developmental delay in the functional connectivity of the reading network was suggested by the other study 43 .…”
Section: Development Of the Reading Network In Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For phonological skills acquired earlier than reading, the development of associated phonological networks was delayed in poor reading children. The bilateral STG, left middle temporal gyrus, right insula, and frontal cortex were engaged by typical readers during auditory rhyming at the beginning of formal education and by dyslexic readers two years later 48 . Similarly, a developmental delay in the functional connectivity of the reading network was suggested by the other study 43 .…”
Section: Development Of the Reading Network In Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In an auditory phonological task, a developmental decrease in activation in the left inferior parietal cortex (IPC) and bilateral precuneus in typical readers from the beginning of formal education until the emergent reading stage (5 to 7–9 years of age) was reported. Another study 48 revealed reduced activity in the left perisylvian cortex (including IPC) for the auditory rhyming task in typical readers after the first 2 years of formal education, which was more pronounced in children without familial history of dyslexia. Functional connectivity analysis revealed that the connection strength between the left IPC, left IFG, left vOT, and right angular gyrus co‐developed with the growth of phonological skills 49 .…”
Section: Typical Reading Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Magnetic resonance studies confirm abnormal and/or hypoactivation of temporo-occipital, temporo-parietal, left lower parietal, as well as the anterior and posterior cingulate regions (posterior areas of the left brain [2,3]. One study also found greater activation of the temporal region of right hemisphere in individuals with DD [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Developmental dyslexia (DD) are a neurobiological disorder characterized mainly by an impaired ability to decode and automatically, precisely recognize written words [1]. Magnetic resonance studies confirm abnormal and/or hypoactivation of temporo-occipital, temporo-parietal, left lower parietal, as well as the anterior and posterior cingulate regions (posterior areas of the left brain [2,3]. One study also found greater activation of the temporal region of right hemisphere in individuals with DD [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brains of children with dyslexia show peculiarities that can affect various regions, including for example the visual word form area ( Dehaene and Cohen, 2011 ), Broca’s area ( Paulesu et al, 2001 ), the magnocellular pathway ( Stein, 2001 ) and the cerebellum ( Nicolson et al, 2001 ). However, these patterns are not consistent across subjects ( Kraft et al, 2016 ; Łuniewska et al, 2019 ), and thus behavioral tasks remain the most effective assessment available ( Fletcher, 2009 ; Ramus et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%