2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children’s use of realistic considerations in problem solving: some English evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A physical representation may motivate participants to be involved in the problem they are solving and may help them construct a correct representation of the problem. Research that has investigated physical representation in the past also has similar conclusions about the representation's effectiveness (Cooper & Harries, ; De Lange, ; Freudenthal, ; Palm, ). Given its effectiveness here and the documented benefits in mathematical education and judgment and decision‐making literature (Aprea & Ebner, ; De Corte et al, ; Galesic et al, ; Garcia‐Retamero & Dhami, ; Garcia‐Retamero & Galesic, ; Garcia‐Retamero et al, ), physical representations will also be effective in reducing CH reliance in a wider range of nonlinear problems and contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A physical representation may motivate participants to be involved in the problem they are solving and may help them construct a correct representation of the problem. Research that has investigated physical representation in the past also has similar conclusions about the representation's effectiveness (Cooper & Harries, ; De Lange, ; Freudenthal, ; Palm, ). Given its effectiveness here and the documented benefits in mathematical education and judgment and decision‐making literature (Aprea & Ebner, ; De Corte et al, ; Galesic et al, ; Garcia‐Retamero & Dhami, ; Garcia‐Retamero & Galesic, ; Garcia‐Retamero et al, ), physical representations will also be effective in reducing CH reliance in a wider range of nonlinear problems and contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It seemed that working class children were more likely than service class children to introduce aspects of their everyday knowledge in ways that were not intended by the designers of the items and were thereby disadvantaged (Cooper & Dunne, 1998). Cooper & Harries (2003) proposed a continuum of context problems representing the range of extents to which students are expected to take account of extra-mathematical aspects of context. At one end of the spectrum, the extra-mathematical material is completely extraneous and the intention is that it be ignored.…”
Section: Evidence In Relation To Impacts On Students' Mathematical Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooper and Harries (2003) conducted a study on DWR problem for solving and interpreting. The participants of their study was 14 working class students who were 11-12 years old.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%