2016
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's Reasoning About Which Episode of a Repeated Event is Best Remembered

Abstract: SummaryDespite much research into children's ability to report information from an individual episode of a repeated event, their capacity to identify well‐remembered episodes is unknown. Children (n = 177) from Grades 1 to 3 participated in four episodes of a repeated event and were later asked to recall the time that they remembered ‘best’ and then ‘another time.’ Post‐recall, children were asked what they believed ‘the time you remember best’ meant, and how they decided which episode to recall. Older childre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, assessment of maternal ACEs was based on retrospective self-report. Recall of ACEs history may be susceptible to memory inaccuracies which may be especially compromised among participants who have experienced trauma [ 57 ]. We did not include other retrospective measures of child maltreatment or adversity in the current study in order to obtain more homogeneous estimates of the association between the cumulative nature of ACEs and maternal mental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, assessment of maternal ACEs was based on retrospective self-report. Recall of ACEs history may be susceptible to memory inaccuracies which may be especially compromised among participants who have experienced trauma [ 57 ]. We did not include other retrospective measures of child maltreatment or adversity in the current study in order to obtain more homogeneous estimates of the association between the cumulative nature of ACEs and maternal mental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children 5 to 9 years old ( N = 401, 54% female) were recruited from primary schools across Melbourne, Australia and surrounding areas to take part in several larger studies on children’s repeated event memory (Danby, Brubacher, Sharman & Powell, 2015; Danby, Brubacher, Sharman, Powell & Roberts, 2016; Danby, Brubacher, Sharman & Powell, 2017; Danby, Sharman, Brubacher, Powell & Roberts, 2017 ). Children were randomly assigned to the what ( n = 198, M age = 7.07, SD = 1.19) or why ( n = 203, M age = 7.08, SD = 1.23) conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrospective recall of participant trauma history could be susceptible to natural memory inaccuracies which may be especially compromised among participants who have experienced ACE (e.g. Danby, Brubacher, Sharman, Powell, & Roberts, 2017). Conduct of longitudinal designs could address this concern.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%