2015
DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2015.1101749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's imaginaries in the city: on things and materials

Abstract: Abstract:The article is an exploration of urban imaginaries emerging through a play with materials. Starting from a complex activist exercise for reimagining the space of a park in decay, whose protagonists are children, we propose a reflection on the productivity and resilience of matter. We argue that a new materialist sociology is one that takes disappearances seriously. Capitalism renders space abstract not only through flow and circulation, but also through stillness. We follow the curious disappearances … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That children negotiate use and access to urban environments shows that they master their way around the city and have learned ways to tackle daily urban problems; they created a coping mechanism. This represents their understanding of urban environments as a place of ongoing negotiations and alterations, not as a finite product, as acknowledged by urban planning and design professionals relayed by Soreanu and Hurducaș (2016). Further, children's alterations do not touch streets as everyday places, unlike the claims of Çakırer Özservet (2014a) and Tandoğan (2015); streets between public places are invisible in children's narratives because the spatial exploration of children does not involve streets as they were usually driven to everyday places like school, park, and playground.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That children negotiate use and access to urban environments shows that they master their way around the city and have learned ways to tackle daily urban problems; they created a coping mechanism. This represents their understanding of urban environments as a place of ongoing negotiations and alterations, not as a finite product, as acknowledged by urban planning and design professionals relayed by Soreanu and Hurducaș (2016). Further, children's alterations do not touch streets as everyday places, unlike the claims of Çakırer Özservet (2014a) and Tandoğan (2015); streets between public places are invisible in children's narratives because the spatial exploration of children does not involve streets as they were usually driven to everyday places like school, park, and playground.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Urban planning research and practice is an adult-centered discipline by its nature. Urban planning professionals desire to shape and understand space as a finite product (Soreanu & Hurducaș, 2016). That finite product is procured through a rational planning process that requires "technocratic language and application of pragmatic and hermeneutic knowledge" (Horelli, 1998, p. 228).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children also highlighted more mundane, albeit perhaps more playable additions to public space, such as the newly installed jet fountain which has become a popular family attraction in the city centre. These examples show that sensible public art interventions, as promoted by Hull UKCoC, have a real impact on children, particularly if they can be used and serve an integrative agenda that promotes play, creativity and intergenerational encounters (Soreanu & Hurducaș 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%