2007
DOI: 10.1177/1367493507076061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's attitudes and behavioural intentions towards a peer with symptoms of ADHD: does the addition of a diagnostic label make a difference?

Abstract: This article explores the impact of diagnostic/psychiatric labelling on the attitudes and behavioural intentions of school-aged children towards a hypothetical peer presented with symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A sample of 120 children aged 11-12 years read one of three vignettes describing the behaviour of a gender-neutral, same-age peer presenting with symptoms of ADHD. The participants completed self-report measures of attitudes and behavioural intentions after reading the resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
49
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(27 reference statements)
7
49
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In rating their own views, youth without TS showed less positive attitudes towards youth with TS in comparison to typically developing peers [30,31]. However, in comparison to other studies that utilise the same assessment tool (Adjective Checklist) individuals with TS were rated more positively than children with ADHD [50], autism [51] or obesity [52] by their peers. With respect to gender, boys appeared to have a more positive attitude towards children with TS than did girls [30] and adolescent females with TS were seen less favourably than females without tics [31].…”
Section: Attested Attitudes and Behavioural Intentions Towards Childrmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In rating their own views, youth without TS showed less positive attitudes towards youth with TS in comparison to typically developing peers [30,31]. However, in comparison to other studies that utilise the same assessment tool (Adjective Checklist) individuals with TS were rated more positively than children with ADHD [50], autism [51] or obesity [52] by their peers. With respect to gender, boys appeared to have a more positive attitude towards children with TS than did girls [30] and adolescent females with TS were seen less favourably than females without tics [31].…”
Section: Attested Attitudes and Behavioural Intentions Towards Childrmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…I also suggest Clausen (1981) as an excellent review essay that articulates well the complex literature on psychiatric diagnosis and stigma. My own view on stigma runs something like this: When children with GID are socially ostracized by their peers, it is their overt behavior that elicits negative reactions (see, e.g., Fridell, 2001), not an abstract label (see, e.g., Law, Sinclair, & Fraser, 2007). There is considerable evidence that, even in normative samples of children, cross-gender behavior is appraised negatively by the peer group, and more so in boys than it is in girls (Zucker, Wilson-Smith, Kurita, & Stern, 1995).…”
Section: Threshold Versus Subthreshold Comparative Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…57 One vignette study sought to explore the impact of diagnostic/psychiatric labeling on the attitudes and behavioral intentions of school-age children towards a hypothetical peer presenting with ADHD symptoms. 52 Law et al recruited 120 children from schools in the UK and found that the majority of participants held predominantly negative attitudes towards the vignette child with ADHD symptoms, with no additional effect of diagnostic/psychiatric labeling on children's attitudes and social behavioral intentions. vignette study.…”
Section: Public Stigmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Other measurement approaches to public stigma perception have utilized vignettes depicting persons with symptoms of various mental or physical disorders, combined with assessment of stigmatizing beliefs (prejudice, eg, perceived danger to self or others) and of stigmatizing actions (discrimination, eg, social distance, social regulation). [51][52][53][54][55][56] For a current relevant detailed example of this approach, please see the description of the etiology and effects of the stigma model used for the National Stigma Study -Children (see page 52). 53 …”
Section: Stigma Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation