2003
DOI: 10.1080/02699930143000725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's ability to control the facial expression of laughter and smiling: Knowledge and behaviour

Abstract: A total of 64 children, aged 7 and 10, watched a clown performing three sketches rated as very funny by the children. Two experimental conditions were created by asking half of the participants to suppress their laughter. Facial expressions were videotaped and analysed with FACS. For both ages, the results show a significant shorter duration (but not a lower frequency) of episodes of laughter and Duchenne smiles, and greater frequency of facial control movements in the suppression compared to the free expressi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes an emotional response belongs directly to the subject (e.g., a subjective feeling) but sometimes it is expressed through the avatar (e.g., avoidance behaviour). Observational paradigms such as field studies (e.g., [36], [37], [38], [39]) boast ecological validity but often lack the appropriate scientific control for reliable induction of emotion, can be impractical, or limit the comprehensive measurement (e.g., physiological changes).…”
Section: Current Induction Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes an emotional response belongs directly to the subject (e.g., a subjective feeling) but sometimes it is expressed through the avatar (e.g., avoidance behaviour). Observational paradigms such as field studies (e.g., [36], [37], [38], [39]) boast ecological validity but often lack the appropriate scientific control for reliable induction of emotion, can be impractical, or limit the comprehensive measurement (e.g., physiological changes).…”
Section: Current Induction Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, studies on the expressive patterns of positive emotions were often limited to either a small set of emotions, and/or are specific to one modality (i.e., facial features or vocalizations; for a review see [7]). For example, [25] claimed that sensory pleasures, mirth, happiness, and joy are expressed by smiling. In posing studies, awe, pride and amusement contained a smile in 56 -85% of the expressions (see [26]).…”
Section: Laughter and Smiling In Positive Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence is mixed on whether the AU6 can serve as a "reliable" muscle which is an inevitable sign of enjoyment as compared to posed smiles (AU6 also occurs in posed DDs [11] [17]), but it was shown that the action of the AU6 plays an important role in the perception of spontaneity, authenticity, genuineness of smiles and judgment accuracy [30] [31] [32] [33]. 2 [15] [19] [25] [34] defined the basis of joyful laughter (Duchenne laughter) to consist of a DD plus an audible, laughter-related vocalization and open mouth. DD laughter is typically lasting longer than DD smiling, and entails a more intense contraction of the zygomatic major muscle.…”
Section: Laughter and Smiling In Positive Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modulated expressions, rather than the prototypical displays, are the "normal" forms of emotional expression that need to be explored. Although a number of studies have explored display rules (Ceschi & Scherer, 2003;Levenson, 1994;Levenson, 2002), virtually nothing seems to be known about the display rules for vocalizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%