2016
DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Childhood Victimization in a National Sample of Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Abstract: There are a number of hidden populations in the United States whose victimization goes undetected and unreported. This study aims to assess the victimization experiences of one such population: American children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Utilizing the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire (JVQ), this study obtained past‐year and lifetime prevalence rates of interpersonal violence in a sample of children with ASDs (N = 262). Results showed that almost 89% of these children had experienced … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study addresses the methodological limitations of the existing literature by using a well-established methodology for identifying children with ASD and linking those records to referrals to TNDCS. The finding that children with ASD in the TN-ADDM surveillance area are more than two and one-half times more likely than control children to be referred to TNDCS is generally consistent with previous reports of high rates of child protection encounters for children with disabilities, including ASD (Hall-Lande et al, 2015;Mandell et al, 2005;Pfeffer, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The current study addresses the methodological limitations of the existing literature by using a well-established methodology for identifying children with ASD and linking those records to referrals to TNDCS. The finding that children with ASD in the TN-ADDM surveillance area are more than two and one-half times more likely than control children to be referred to TNDCS is generally consistent with previous reports of high rates of child protection encounters for children with disabilities, including ASD (Hall-Lande et al, 2015;Mandell et al, 2005;Pfeffer, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The five included articles were from USA [7,57], Spain [58], Norway [56], Hong Kong [59], and France [60].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parents or major caregivers provided proxy reports. Another study recruited 262 respondents through an online networking collaboration for families affected by autism [57]. Due to Institutional Review Board restrictions around the direct questioning of children with disabilities, the study used caregivers as respondents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple studies have shown that those with ASD experience higher rates of peer victimization than TD peers (Bear et al 2015;Chan et al 2018;Humphrey and Symes 2011;Rose et al 2015;Rowley et al 2012;Twyman et al 2010;Wainscot et al 2008;Zeedyk et al 2014) and peers with other disabilities (Humphrey and Symes 2011;Rowley et al 2012;Twyman et al 2010;Zeedyk et al 2014). Parents of children and adolescents with ASD report peer victimization rates ranging from around 40% to 90% across studies (Cappadocia et al 2012;Little 2002;Maiano et al 2016;Pfeffer 2016;Sterzing et al 2012), with variability across studies explained, to some extent, by the time frame used for measuring peer victimization (Maiano et al 2016; e.g., lifetime vs. weekly occurrence). Nevertheless, even if the true rates of peer victimization for this group fall at the lower end of this range that would indicate a substantial number of individuals with ASD are encountering negative peer experiences.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Peer Victimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%