2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Childhood economic disadvantage and antisocial behavior: Intervening factors and pathways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum parental education level was used to determine childhood SES; the participants' own educational level determined adulthood SES; both were presented as a 9-point education level scale (0-No high school diploma, 1-GED, 2-High school diploma, 3-Technical training, 4-Some college, no degree, 5-Associate degree, 6-Bachelor's degree, 7-Master's degree, 8-MD/PhD/JD/PharmD). Measures such as low SES, socioeconomic disadvantage or neighborhood deprivation in early life are considered forms of childhood deprivation (Berti & Pivetti, 2019;McLaughlin et al, 2014;Morris, Berk, Maes, Carvalho, & Puri, 2019;Webb et al, 2017). Further, education level is often used as an index of SES and has been shown to identify mental health inequalities (Reiss, 2013), is associated with physiological measures of stress (Ursache, Merz, Melvin, Meyer, & Noble, 2017) and is a strong predictor of physical health, namely cardiovascular disease risk (Winkleby, Jatulis, Frank, & Fortmann, 1992).…”
Section: Childhood Socioeconomic Deprivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum parental education level was used to determine childhood SES; the participants' own educational level determined adulthood SES; both were presented as a 9-point education level scale (0-No high school diploma, 1-GED, 2-High school diploma, 3-Technical training, 4-Some college, no degree, 5-Associate degree, 6-Bachelor's degree, 7-Master's degree, 8-MD/PhD/JD/PharmD). Measures such as low SES, socioeconomic disadvantage or neighborhood deprivation in early life are considered forms of childhood deprivation (Berti & Pivetti, 2019;McLaughlin et al, 2014;Morris, Berk, Maes, Carvalho, & Puri, 2019;Webb et al, 2017). Further, education level is often used as an index of SES and has been shown to identify mental health inequalities (Reiss, 2013), is associated with physiological measures of stress (Ursache, Merz, Melvin, Meyer, & Noble, 2017) and is a strong predictor of physical health, namely cardiovascular disease risk (Winkleby, Jatulis, Frank, & Fortmann, 1992).…”
Section: Childhood Socioeconomic Deprivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies found that socio-economic reasons such as family background (Aute et al (2020)), place of residence (Zhang (2016)), parents' education level (Chalfin and Deza (2019)), household income (Berti and Pivetti (2019)), gender (Kim 2021), and urbanisation (Wahab et al (2018)) are some contributing factors to the delinquent behaviour of adolescents. Hence, the delinquency rate among students in Shah Alam in this section is studied from socio-economic reasons under the following sub-themes: gender differences, parents' income, parents' educational level, parents' social status, and urbanisation.…”
Section: The Adolescents' Delinquency Rate and Socio-economic Reasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their parents only earn RM1000 (USD 240)-2000 (USD 480) monthly, while only 7.5% of them come from high-income families. Berti and Pivetti (2019) discussed the connection between economic disadvantage and antisocial behaviour and said that poverty leads to social misconduct and crimes. Browman et al (2019) also have similar findings.…”
Section: (Ii) Parents' Incomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…La delincuencia toma una dimensión diferente al incluir en el análisis el contexto; desde décadas pasadas se consideraban factores de riesgo: la pobreza (Berti y Pivetti, 2019), vivir en zonas de desempleo, baja supervisión de los padres y los AVE; todos ellos son observados, tanto como fac-tor de riesgo, como indicadores para contemplarlos dentro de propuestas de prevención (Hoffmann, 2003). Las razones para considerar el contexto socioeconómico, sobre todo de bajo nivel, se debe a los mayores estresores y una mayor utilización de estrategias de afrontamiento interno, principalmente al advertir que las familias de nivel medio alto utilizan más el apoyo social como estrategia de afrontamiento (Cracco y Blanco Larrieux, 2015); por último, respecto a esta propuesta, es pertinente señalar que no se puede considerar la pobreza en sí misma como un determinante, sino como parte de los estresores vitales y vinculados a políticas sociales y económicas.…”
Section: Aspectos Teóricosunclassified