2008
DOI: 10.7249/mg795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Child-Care Quality Rating and Improvement Systems in Five Pioneer States: Implementation Issues and Lessons Learned

Abstract: This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permission… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QRIS have been designed to serve as a state’s overall ECE accountability system and are largely hinged on a multidimensional assessment of child care program quality (Schaack, Tarrant, Boller, & Tout, 2012). Drawing on decades of research, states have constructed QRIS to measure and improve aspects of child care settings commonly associated with children’s positive cognitive and social development (Zellman& Perlman, 2008). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QRIS have been designed to serve as a state’s overall ECE accountability system and are largely hinged on a multidimensional assessment of child care program quality (Schaack, Tarrant, Boller, & Tout, 2012). Drawing on decades of research, states have constructed QRIS to measure and improve aspects of child care settings commonly associated with children’s positive cognitive and social development (Zellman& Perlman, 2008). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the area of early childcare, a large pool of potential providers exists (e.g., in-home daycares, church centers) and many families qualify for federal assistance with covering the cost of childcare. In this area, federal funding agencies have developed successful partnerships with private providers by increasing funding to those demonstrating delivery of high quality care (Zellman & Perlman, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the U.S., Head Start and Early Head Start now include FCC as an official option for the delivery of services to children and families, and several states include FCC in their universal pre-K initiatives and quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS) designed to help parents choose high-quality child care and to incentivize providers to enhance quality of care for children (Morrissey 2007;Tout et al 2010;Zellman and Perlman 2008). As a result of these trends, a variety of child care and social service agencies in communities across the country have developed programs to support home-based child care providers-both FCC and FFN caregivers, including child care resource and referral (CCR&R) agencies and networks that offer support services, technical assistance, materials and equipment, and training to providers (Hershfield et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%