2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways

Abstract: Lower plant transpiration rate (TR) under high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) conditions and early plant vigor are proposed as major traits influencing the rate of crop water use and possibly the fitness of chickpea lines to specific terminal drought conditions—this being the major constraint limiting chickpea productivity. The physiological mechanisms underlying difference in TR under high VPD and vigor are still unresolved, and so is the link between vigor and TR. Lower TR is hypothesized to relate to hydrauli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, similar results were observed in kiwi plants, where leaf area-specific conductance and g s were both higher in the low-vigor rootstocks [28]. Finally, one more study with two chickpea progenies showed the same type of behavior, being the low-vigor plants the ones with higher root hydraulic conductivity and higher transpiration rates [29]. This higher Lp r in small root systems of low-vigor plants seems to try to compensate the low biomass production, while vigorous plants, which may be less efficient per biomass unit, have bigger root systems, with more biomass accumulation, and in conclusion higher total root hydraulic conductance.…”
Section: Physiological Component Of Vigorsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Later, similar results were observed in kiwi plants, where leaf area-specific conductance and g s were both higher in the low-vigor rootstocks [28]. Finally, one more study with two chickpea progenies showed the same type of behavior, being the low-vigor plants the ones with higher root hydraulic conductivity and higher transpiration rates [29]. This higher Lp r in small root systems of low-vigor plants seems to try to compensate the low biomass production, while vigorous plants, which may be less efficient per biomass unit, have bigger root systems, with more biomass accumulation, and in conclusion higher total root hydraulic conductance.…”
Section: Physiological Component Of Vigorsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In parallel work we have shown that blockers of the apoplastic pathway were indeed absorbed and a precipitate was visible in the apoplastic pathway (Sivasakthi et al 2017). Though the precipitates of apoplast blockers were not visible here the combined effect of K 4 (Fe(CN) 6 ) and CuSO 4 reduced the transpiration of PRLT-2/89-33 more than the effect of CuSO 4 alone, whereas the transpiration of H77/833-2 suffered only slightly more from the addition of K4(Fe(CN) 6 ) after Cu, indicating that the method was still valid to compare dependence on the apoplast and AQP-mediated pathways.…”
Section: Possible Caveats Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Upon emergence of cotyledonary leaves after 5 days, seedlings of uniform size and without visible root injuries were transferred to modified Hoagland solution. Composition of basal nutrient solution was MgSO 4 (1mM), K 2 SO 4 (0.92 mM), CaCl 2 .2H 2 O (0.75 mM), KH 2 PO4 (0.25 mM), Fe-EDTA (0.04mM), Urea (5 mM), and micronutrients [H 3 BO 3 (2.4μM), MnSO 4 (0.9μM), ZnSO 4 (0.6μM), CuSO 4 (0.62μM), and Na 2 MoO 4 (0.6μM)] [32]. Concentration of P was maintained with two P levels: normal P (250 μM) and low P (3μM).…”
Section: Methods and Materials Plant Materials And Plant Growth Conditmentioning
confidence: 99%