1977
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90098-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chicken macrochromosomes contain an endogenous provirus and microchromosomes contain sequences related to the transforming gene of ASV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
38
1

Year Published

1978
1978
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chromosomes were fractionated by sucrose gradient centrifugation (10,17); two chromosome gradients from the MSB-1 lymphoid line (15) were examined, and similar results were obtained with both. The results presented in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Chromosomes were fractionated by sucrose gradient centrifugation (10,17); two chromosome gradients from the MSB-1 lymphoid line (15) were examined, and similar results were obtained with both. The results presented in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Each chromosome fraction (1 ml each of fractions 8 to 21, Fig. 1), prepared as previously described (10,17) Filters were then hybridized with specific v-erb-A and verb-B probes (29). The results are shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is remarkable that the introduction into the cell of a single protein, the product of the src gene, can induce a new steady state. In this connection, it is of great interest that the genome of normal chicken cells contains a gene that is substantially, but apparently not completely, homologous to the DNA that is complementary to the src gene of the viral RNA (29)(30)(31). This suggests that, if the src gene product is indeed a protein kinase, it is closely related to a normal cell protein kinase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of current interest in protein-DNA interactions (Igo-Kemenes et at., 1982) and evidence that the site of integration of virus DNA sequences may influence the outcome of virus infection (Neel et al, 1981 ;Payne et al, 198 I), it would seem that chromosomal transfer will continue to be a valuable experimental tool, particularly in conjunction with new techniques for chromosome fractionation (Carrano J.G. LEVIN AND OTHERS et al, 1979;Padgett et al, 1977) and detection of unique DNA sequences by in situ hybridization (Tereba et al, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%