2010
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2009.2029722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$\chi^2$ Random Fields in Space and Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important feature of (2) is that it allows for any correlation structure, whenever a mixing variable has a second-order moment. Another important feature is that it does not have a restriction or a tight connection between its mean and covariance functions, unlike log-Gaussian [42] or cases [39], so that the spherically invariant random field may be relatively more flexible for applications. The latter feature of being analytically easy to manipulate would make second-order spherically invariant random fields work effectively for studying various correlation effects in science and engineering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important feature of (2) is that it allows for any correlation structure, whenever a mixing variable has a second-order moment. Another important feature is that it does not have a restriction or a tight connection between its mean and covariance functions, unlike log-Gaussian [42] or cases [39], so that the spherically invariant random field may be relatively more flexible for applications. The latter feature of being analytically easy to manipulate would make second-order spherically invariant random fields work effectively for studying various correlation effects in science and engineering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, [11], [12], the non-Gaussianity cannot be neglected [7], and there are often specific reasons for assuming particular non-Gaussian finite-dimensional distributions [2], [4], [9], [17], [20]- [22], [27], [30], [32], [34], [35], [38], [39], [44]- [46], [48]- [50], [52], [55], [56]. For example, "One of the main problems in statistical analysis of multi-component images and multidimensional signals is the choice of relevant statistical parametric laws" [7], and the electromagnetic environment encountered by receiver systems is often non-Gaussian in nature [62].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stationary process X m is a scaled version of a 2 random process (Adler, 1981;Ma, 2010) with marginal distribution Gamma(m/2,m/2), where the pairs m/2,m/2 are the shape and rate parameters. By definition, E(X m (s)) = 1 and Var(X m (s)) = 2∕m for all s.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we shall look at processes that are derived by Gaussian processes but differently from the trans-Gaussian random processes and the copula models we do not consider just one copy of the Gaussian process. We suggest to model positive continuous data by transforming 2 processes (Adler, 1981;Ma, 2010), that is, a sum of squared of independent copies of a standard Gaussian process. Even though probabilistic properties of a sum of squared Gaussian processes have been studied several years ago, less attention has been paid to use this for statistical modeling of dependent positive data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Genton and Zhang (2012) pointed out identifiability problems related to the above construction. Ma (2010) built the χ 2 random process by summation of the squares of m independent Gaussian processes and extended it to the multivariate case (Ma, 2011). A series of papers with the same author combined the above two ideas and constructed many special cases for non-Gaussian vector random fields, such as the hyperbolic vector random fields (Du et al, 2012) and the K-distributed process (Ma, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Review On Non-gaussian Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%