2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01567.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chewing ability and quality of life in an 80‐year‐old population

Abstract: As quality of life (QOL) could be influenced by oral status in the elderly, we examined whether chewing ability or number of teeth affected QOL in 80-year olds. A cross-sectional survey included dental examination, chewing self-assessment, and a QOL questionnaire. A total of 823 people who were 80 years old participated in this study. QOL was assessed in terms of satisfaction with physical condition, meals, daily living and social interactions, and with face-scale scores. After adjustment for gender, spouse an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
62
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
62
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Health insurance policyholders had higher OHRQoL than recipients of medical aid, which is similar to studies by Park et al 12) and Lee and Park 20) Regarding subjective oral health status of the subjects, OHRQoL was higher in subjects who perceived their oral and periodontal status as healthier, had no toothache, had no interference in mastication, and were able to soften food. These results matched a report by Takata et al 22) , which stated that masticatory ability was a factor affecting OHRQoL, and a report by Jung and Shin 23) stating the level of oral pain was the most important factor. It was speculated that since subjects who had neither interference in mastication nor toothache feel less discomfort during food intake, hence perceive subjective oral status and periodontal status as healthy; therefore, their OHRQoL is higher.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Health insurance policyholders had higher OHRQoL than recipients of medical aid, which is similar to studies by Park et al 12) and Lee and Park 20) Regarding subjective oral health status of the subjects, OHRQoL was higher in subjects who perceived their oral and periodontal status as healthier, had no toothache, had no interference in mastication, and were able to soften food. These results matched a report by Takata et al 22) , which stated that masticatory ability was a factor affecting OHRQoL, and a report by Jung and Shin 23) stating the level of oral pain was the most important factor. It was speculated that since subjects who had neither interference in mastication nor toothache feel less discomfort during food intake, hence perceive subjective oral status and periodontal status as healthy; therefore, their OHRQoL is higher.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…On the contrary, it was inconsistent with the results from a study by Takata et al 22) , which stated that there was no effect of remaining teeth on OHRQoL. should be closely related with systemic health condition 16) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…3 Since arthritis and rheumatic conditions represent the leading causes of disability in the USA, 4 and whereas the prevalence of osteoarthrosis has been assessed for different joints (wrist, hand, knee) in representative samples, it would be of interest to assess the prevalence of osteoarthrosis (OA) of the temporomandibular condyle since the TMJ is one of the most frequently used joints and a limitation of chewing ability influences the quality of life. 5 When assessing the prevalence of OA, the first challenge is the widely recognized disparity between objective diagnosis, based on imaging evidence, and patient-reported symptoms of pain or disability. 6 However, objective diagnoses (such as imaging modalities) provide more reproducible results and facilitate more accurate comparative studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 A decline in MP may result in changes in the diet, as some foods become difficult to eat. [4][5][6][7] The test material used to determine MP should provide an ideal bolus for the scientific study of mastication. 3,[8][9][10][11][12] A natural food has the advantage that it is normally consumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%