2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.21.20136598
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chest X-ray classification using Deep learning for automated COVID-19 screening

Abstract: In today's world, we find ourselves struggling to fight one of the worst pandemics in the history of humanity known as COVID-2019 caused by a coronavirus. If we detect the virus at an early stage (before it enters the lower respiratory tract), the patient can be treated quickly. Once the virus reaches the lungs, we observe ground-glass opacity in the chest X-ray due to fibrosis in the lungs. Due to the significant differences between X-ray images of an infected and non-infected person, artificial intelligence … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using 8 different Deep Learning Model [4] researchers found NasNet and MobileNet outperformed all the models and they used both CT image and X-ray images to evaluate their system.DenseNets concatenates output features rather than sum the output feature maps of the layer with the incoming feature maps.DenseNet outperformed than other models [18] having 85% sensitivity.In the following section, some other feature extraction methods adopted by the researchers are discussed elaborately. [4], [7], [10], [13], [14], [18], [20], [22], [27], [28], [31], [32], [38], [40], [41], [44], [ 47], [51], [61], [62], [66], [67], [71], [73], [74] 26…”
Section: Feature Extraction Methods For X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Using 8 different Deep Learning Model [4] researchers found NasNet and MobileNet outperformed all the models and they used both CT image and X-ray images to evaluate their system.DenseNets concatenates output features rather than sum the output feature maps of the layer with the incoming feature maps.DenseNet outperformed than other models [18] having 85% sensitivity.In the following section, some other feature extraction methods adopted by the researchers are discussed elaborately. [4], [7], [10], [13], [14], [18], [20], [22], [27], [28], [31], [32], [38], [40], [41], [44], [ 47], [51], [61], [62], [66], [67], [71], [73], [74] 26…”
Section: Feature Extraction Methods For X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DenseNet [1], [4], [7], [14], [18][22], [23], [28], [30], [31], [41], [47], [48], [52], [56], [66], [67], [7 2], [74] 19…”
Section: Feature Extraction Methods For X-rayunclassified
See 3 more Smart Citations