1994
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chest pain in women: clinical, investigative, and prognostic features

Abstract: In this series, although women comprised the minority of patients referred with chest pain, a diagnosis of normal coronary arteries was five times more common in women than men. Risk factor analysis and exercise testing were of limited value in predicting coronary artery disease in women. There was no sex bias regarding revascularisation procedures, and outcome was similar. A diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain in patients with normal coronary arteries was of little benefit to the patient with regard to morbid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
120
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
120
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although confounding hypertension and diabetes, both of which affect the microvasculature, were more prevalent in women, previous cardiac or aortic surgery was more often documented in men (Table 1); diabetes and associated microvascular pathology are known to coincide with greater risk for cardiac mortality in women. 32 Increased mortality in type A dissection reminds us of the findings of increased mortality for women treated invasively with either percutaneous coronary intervention 33,34 or bypass surgery [35][36][37] for acute coronary syndromes.…”
Section: Nienaber Et Al Gender and Aortic Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although confounding hypertension and diabetes, both of which affect the microvasculature, were more prevalent in women, previous cardiac or aortic surgery was more often documented in men (Table 1); diabetes and associated microvascular pathology are known to coincide with greater risk for cardiac mortality in women. 32 Increased mortality in type A dissection reminds us of the findings of increased mortality for women treated invasively with either percutaneous coronary intervention 33,34 or bypass surgery [35][36][37] for acute coronary syndromes.…”
Section: Nienaber Et Al Gender and Aortic Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, when women develop obstructive CAD they have a greater functional expression of their disease and disability compared with men. A majority of women without obstructive CAD at coronary angiography continue to have symptom-related disability and consume considerable healthcare resources, [15][16][17] in part because the pathophysiology of ischemia in women is incompletely understood and gender-specific diagnostic and treatment strategies are underdeveloped.…”
Section: Workhop Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To pokazuje i podatak da se aeene oboljele od KBS prosjeËno hospitaliziraju sa 68, dok se muπkarci hospitaliziraju sa 61 godinu aeivota. 8 Patoloπki koronarogram je pet puta ËeπÊi u muπkara-ca, ali u sluËaju njegove dijagnoze, muπkarci imaju bolje rezultate nakon postupka perkutane koronarne intervencije (PCI) [9][10][11][12] . VeÊ spomenuti veliki epidemioloπki znaËaj KBS, razlike u prevalenciji bolesti ovisno o spolu te potreba za definiranjem utjecaja razliËitih drugih Ëimbenika ovu bolest, naveli su nas na ovo istraaeivanje.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…This is demonstrated by the fact that women with CAD are on the average hospitalized at the age of 68, while the men are hospitalized at the age of 61. 8 Pathological coronarogram is five times more common in men, but in case it is diagnosed, men have better results after the percutaneous coronary intervention procedure (PCI) [9][10][11][12] . The above-mentioned large epidemiological significance of CAD, differences in the prevalence of the disease, and the need for defining the impact of some other factors on this disease made us conduct this investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%