1994
DOI: 10.1016/1352-2310(94)90208-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chesapeake bay atmospheric deposition study, year 1: Sources and dry deposition of selected elements in aerosol particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
22
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They estimated dry deposition of about 2 ug/m2/y as particulate Se, with wet deposition perhaps two orders of magnitude greater. Their estimate of the dry deposition velocity of particulate Se (0.07 mm/s) is much smaller than our estimates based solely on particle size and those of Wu et al (1994).…”
Section: Background and Urban Aerosol Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…They estimated dry deposition of about 2 ug/m2/y as particulate Se, with wet deposition perhaps two orders of magnitude greater. Their estimate of the dry deposition velocity of particulate Se (0.07 mm/s) is much smaller than our estimates based solely on particle size and those of Wu et al (1994).…”
Section: Background and Urban Aerosol Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…In Seoul, six components accounting for approximately 91.7% of the total variability were identified. The first component (44.4% of the total variance) with the high loadings of several elements (V, Pb, Zn, K, and S) suggest contributions from such sources as oil combustion, incineration, and motor vehicles (e.g., Wu et al, 1994). It may also be related to the re-suspension of soil dust, secondary aerosol, and marine aerosol.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Metal Levels Of Each Study Sitementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The effect of dust could be physical through deposition of particles on the surfaces of leaves, with adverse effect on the growth of plants (Iqbal and Shafig 2001) and variations of stomata activities (opening and closing mechanisms) (Krajickova and Mejstrik 1984), and it could be chemical through the nutrient absorption from the soil and modifications of cycling of nutrients necessary for plants and their availability for uptake by plants (Stoorvogel et al 1997;Kurtz et al 2001;Reynolds et al 2001). There has also been a focus on the seasonal variations of chemical composition of dust (Zhong et al 1994;Norra and Stüben 2004;Elemide and Abulude 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%