Chemotherapy with cetuximab versus chemotherapy alone for chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lin

et al. 2017

Intl Journal of Cancer

Agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are used to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); however, their efficacy and safety is poorly understood. Here we evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-EGFR agents administered concurrently with standard therapies for HNSCC. Randomized controlled trials that evaluated addition of EGFR targeted therapy versus standard therapy alone were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), locoregional control, and severe adverse events (SAEs, grade ≥ 3). Sixteen eligible trials with 4031 patients were included. Addition of anti-EGFR regimens to standard therapy significantly improved OS of patients with HNSCC (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96), with a moderately elevated rate of SAEs (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13). Subgroup analysis indicated that the survival benefit was observed when cetuximab was administered concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) for stage III/IV patients (HR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.94; p = 0.01), or with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.95; p = 0.005). Significantly increased ORR (RR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.05-2.18) and PFS (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88) were found in R/M HNSCC patients treated with anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy, while no significant improvements were found in stage III/IV patients treated with anti-EGFR plus standard therapy. In conclusion, addition of cetuximab to standard therapy may improve outcomes for R/M HNSCC patients, while causing a moderate increase in SAEs. For stage III/IV patients, anti-EGFR mAb plus RT can improve OS compared with RT alone, while replacement of chemotherapy with EGFR mAb or adding EGFR mAb to combined chemotherapy and RT did not improve outcomes.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 65%

Efficacy and safety of anti‐EGFR agents administered concurrently with standard therapies for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Lin

et al. 2017

Intl Journal of Cancer

“…CTX in combination with standard cytotoxic therapies has shown consistent anticancer activity across a wide range of EGFR-expressing tumors, including NPC, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), colorectal cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer 12, 19-21. Ma et al conducted a phase II study of concurrent CTX-CDDP and IMRT in locoregionally advanced NPC and reported the 2-year progression-free survival rate of 86.5% with tolerable treatment-related toxicities.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with or without Anti-EGFR-Targeted Treatment for Stage II-IVb Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Retrospective Analysis with a Large Cohort and Long Follow-up

You

Hua²,

Liu³

et al. 2017

Theranostics

We examined the benefits of the combination of anti-EGFR targeted treatment, cetuximab (CTX) or nimotuzumab (NTZ) and concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared with CCRT alone in patients with stage II - IVb nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A total of 1,628 eligible patients with stage II - IVb NPC, who received CCRT (three cycles of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks with intensity-modulated radiotherapy) with or without CTX or NTZ between June 2009 and December 2013 were included in the analysis. Using propensity scores to adjust for potential prognostic factors, a well-balanced cohort of 878 patients was created by matching each patient who received CTX or NTZ plus CCRT with no more than four patients who received CCRT alone (1:4). Efficacy and safety were compared between CTX/NTZ plus CCRT and CCRT alone arms. Compared with CCRT alone, treatment with CTX/NTZ plus CCRT was associated with a significantly increased overall survival (3-year OS, 96.6% vs. 92.9%, P = 0.015), improved disease-free survival (3-year DFS, 93.5% vs 86.9%, P = 0.028), and improved distant metastasis-free survival (3-year DMFS, 94.6% vs 89.3%, P = 0.030). Increased rate of CTX related-skin reaction and mucositis was observed in the CTX plus CCRT arm. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the combination of CTX/NTZ was a significant protective factor for OS, DFS, and DMFS in patients treated with CCRT. Our analysis suggests that the addition of CTX/NTZ to CCRT is more effective for maximizing survival in patients with stage II-IVb NPC compared with CCRT alone.

“… 34 Blockage of EGFR can improve the activity of chemotherapy drugs, such as cisplatin, adriamycin, and etoposide. 35 Other studies have shown that NSCLC patients with EGFR overexpression usually had a poor remission rate after chemotherapy. In the past few years, the relationship between SUV max and EGFR has been demonstrated.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

<sup>18</sup>F-fludrodeoxyglucose maximal standardized uptake value and metabolic tumor burden are associated with major chemotherapy-related tumor markers in NSCLC patients

Bai¹,

Guo²,

Wang³

et al. 2016

OTT

ObjectiveMetabolic activity and tumor burden are significant for prognosis and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Chemotherapy resistance is a great challenge for treating NSCLC patients and is also closely related with several biomarkers such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p53, and excision repair cross-complementing group 1 protein (ERCC1). Our purpose was to determine the correlation between positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters and tumor markers-related chemotherapy resistance in NSCLC.MethodsForty-six NSCLC chemotherapy-naïve patients were enrolled. The SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were calculated by PET/CT imaging, and expression of EGFR, p53, and ERCC1 were analyzed by immunohistochemistry on tissues. SUVmax, MTV, and TLG compared for their performance in predicting the expression of EGFR, p53, and ERCC1 were illustrated with statistical analysis.ResultsSUVmax was significantly correlated with p53 expression (P=0.001), and MTV and TLG were significantly associated with ERCC1 (P=0.000; P=0.000). Furthermore, multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that SUVmax was the primary predictor for p53, MTV and TLG was the primary predictor for ERCC1. SUVmax had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 50% for the detection of p53 positive. The sensitivities of MTV and TLG were 83% and 80%, and specificities were 69% and 75% for the detection of ERCC1 positive, respectively. When we suggested p53 or ERCC1 positive, the cutoff value of SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were 7.68, 23.62, and 129.65 cm3, respectively.ConclusionSUVmax, MTV, and TLG were closely associated with p53 and ERCC1’ expressions. Therefore, 18F-fludrodeoxyglucose PET/CT could be a new way of predicting p53 or ERCC1-related chemotherapy effect in NSCLC patients with more convenience.