2007
DOI: 10.1002/ffj.1797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemistry of floral scents in four Licuala species (Arecaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Floral scent emission patterns often match the activity pattern of pollinators, so they are often investigated from both ecological and systematic perspectives (Meekijjaroenroj et al, 2007). Aroma emission generally starts when the flower is fully opened and peaks during periods when pollinators are most active (Dudareva and Pichersky, 2000;Jiang et al, 2011;Pichersky et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floral scent emission patterns often match the activity pattern of pollinators, so they are often investigated from both ecological and systematic perspectives (Meekijjaroenroj et al, 2007). Aroma emission generally starts when the flower is fully opened and peaks during periods when pollinators are most active (Dudareva and Pichersky, 2000;Jiang et al, 2011;Pichersky et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors have reported on failed efforts to use floral scent chemistry for phylogenetic analysis ( Williams and Whitten, 1999 ; Levin et al, 2003 ; Meekijjaroenroj et al, 2007 ) and as far as we know only two studies have yielded credible phylogenetic patterns ( Barkman, 2001 ; Raguso et al, 2006 ). One possible explanation is that the number of species and especially the number of VOCs used in the studies that failed was quite low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In male euglossine bee-pollinated orchids, floral fragrance data did not reliably indicate phylogeny ( Williams and Whitten, 1999 ). In two genera of Nyctaginaceae, and in four Licuala species (Arecaceae) flower VOCs did not reflect classification ( Levin et al, 2003 ; Meekijjaroenroj et al, 2007 ). While phylogenetic relations based on major floral VOCs revealed no distinct patterns at higher taxonomic levels ( Knudsen et al, 2006 ), phylogenetic patterns were detected in Cypripedium (Orchideaceae) ( Barkman, 2001 ) and within Nicotiana ( Raguso et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They can be referred to as active secondary metabolites from plants because they are very potent at trifling amounts which due to large number of compounds that often define their composition [1], [2]. Floral scents are presumed to have evolved during the course of evolution to guarantee subsistence, and this could explain their dual functions in many plants -they attract pollinators but also contain compounds that act to dissuade herbivory [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%