“…A particular point of interest is sensing of trace VOCs for applications such as indoor air screening or detection of explosives and narcotics, which critically require highly sensitive vapor detectors which ultimately determine the sensitivity of μGC systems. Over the past few decades, a variety of miniaturized vapor detectors have been developed that can be used in μGC, including miniaturized thermal conductivity detectors, surface acoustic wave detectors, chemiresistors, chemicapacitors, and electron capture detectors. − In general, although these microdetectors can achieve extremely small footprint and low operating costs (power and gas consumption), their sensitivity is typically poor compared to the flame ionization detectors (FIDs) widely used in benchtop GC systems, which μGC systems aim to supplement or replace. While FIDs may possess detection limits on the order of sub-picogram or sub-parts per trillion concentrations (e.g., considering a mass of ∼1 pg in 1 L volume), most miniaturized detectors have detection limits around a few parts per million or at best tens of parts per billion. − This poor performance presents a problem for the aforementioned trace vapor analysis applications, which require near picogram detection limits, corresponding to parts per trillion to sub-parts per billion concentration levels (∼ng/L or sub ng/L).…”