1991
DOI: 10.1080/00032719108052948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Method for the Determination of Starch in Polyethylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ISU films did not contain any other additives besides starch and averaged 112 fim (4 mil) thick, whereas ADM films contained a prooxidant and had an average thickness of 88 pm (3.5 mil). The actual starch content of ADM films was estimated to be 5.5 wt %, whereas that of ISU films was estimated to be 4.6 wt % (Fratzke et al, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…ISU films did not contain any other additives besides starch and averaged 112 fim (4 mil) thick, whereas ADM films contained a prooxidant and had an average thickness of 88 pm (3.5 mil). The actual starch content of ADM films was estimated to be 5.5 wt %, whereas that of ISU films was estimated to be 4.6 wt % (Fratzke et al, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%