2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical composition and source apportionment of ambient PM2.5 during the non-heating period in Taian, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
57
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As coal combustion was an important source of SO 2− 4 , Cl − , OC, and EC Liu et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2016Liu et al, , 2017a, it can be inferred that the influence of coal combustion might increase noticeably during the CAHP compared to the NCAHP, which was likely due to the increased usage of coal for domestic heating during winter (Table 1). Additionally, unfavourable meteorological conditions during the CAHP can have an offset effect on the control measures for coal combustion sources.…”
Section: Variations In Chemical Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As coal combustion was an important source of SO 2− 4 , Cl − , OC, and EC Liu et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2016Liu et al, , 2017a, it can be inferred that the influence of coal combustion might increase noticeably during the CAHP compared to the NCAHP, which was likely due to the increased usage of coal for domestic heating during winter (Table 1). Additionally, unfavourable meteorological conditions during the CAHP can have an offset effect on the control measures for coal combustion sources.…”
Section: Variations In Chemical Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 and 10). The chemical profile of factor 1 was mainly represented by Si (72.3 %), Ca 2+ (74.0 %), Mg 2+ (43.9 %), and Al (71.3 %), which were derived mainly from crustal dust Liu et al, 2016 (Santacatalina et al, 2010;Srimuruganandam and Nagendra, 2012;Liu et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2016Liu et al, , 2017a. The contribution proportions of factor 2 to PM 2.5 ranged from 29.5 % (66.4 µg m −3 ) during the NCANHP, 30.8 % (87.9 µg m −3 ) during the NC-AHP, and 31.6 % (84.8 µg m −3 ) during the CAHP to 32.7 % (64.6 µg m −3 ) during the WY, and decreased to 28.8 % (85.2 µg m −3 ) during the ACA.…”
Section: Variations In Pm 25 Source Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the rapidly increasing amount of vehicles in use, automobile exhaust gases are becoming the main sources of PMs in urban areas (Goel and Guttikunda, 2015;Calvo et al, 2013;Karar and Gupta, 2007;Liu et al, 2016a;Kleeman et al, 2000;Police et al, 2016). In particular, fine PMs (particle diameter ≤ 2.5 μm) arouse greater worldwide concerns than coarse PMs (diameter of particle ≤ 10 μm) because fine PMs are able to penetrate lung cells, giving increased toxicity, and scatter light efficiently, leading to extensive visibility reduction (Choi et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2016bChen et al, , 2016cLiu et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%