Chemical Components, Variation, and Source Identification of PM1 during the Heavy Air Pollution Episodes in Beijing in December 2016

Zhang, Yangmei; Wang, Yaqiang; Zhang, Xiaoye; Shen, Xiaojing; Sun, Junying; Wu, Lingyan; Zhang, Zhouxiang; Che, Haochi

doi:10.1007/s13351-018-7051-8

Cited by 30 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3 ). The high proportion of nitrate in PM 2.5 , i.e., 22.2% for 24–28 January and 26.8% for 8–13 February, is in accordance with recent observations in northern China ( Shao et al, 2018 ; Zhang et al, 2018 ) and synchronous measurements in Shanghai (19.5%; Fig. 3 f).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

Drivers for the poor air quality conditions in North China Plain during the COVID-19 outbreak

Wang

Xie

et al. 2021

Atmospheric Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

Drivers for the poor air quality conditions in North China Plain during the COVID-19 outbreak

Wang

Xie

et al. 2021

Atmospheric Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The percentages of HULIS C in WSOC for summer, autumn, winter, and spring, respectively, were 66.7 % ± 5.4 %, 54.1 % ± 11.2 %, 62.3 % ± 5.7 %, and 56.6 % ± 6.3 %, with an annual average of 59.5 % ± 9.2 %, suggesting that HULIS C was the major constituent of WSOC. This value is comparable to the results (about 60 %) at urban sites in the PRD region (Lin et al, 2010b;Fan et al, 2012), Shanghai (Zhao et al, 2015), South Korea (Park et al, 2012), Budapest (Salma et al, 2007(Salma et al, , 2010, and high-alpine areas of Jungfraujoch, Switzerland (Krivácsy et al, 2001). However, it is higher than the rural areas in K-puszta, Hungary (Salma et al, 2010), and the northeastern US (Pavlovic and Hopke, 2012).…”

Section: General Characteristics Of Ambient Aerosolsupporting

confidence: 84%

“…This value is lower than the average value of 11.8 µg m −3 measured at a rural site in the PRD region that was heavily influenced by biomass burning (Lin et al, 2010b). However, it is higher than those measurements in the urban areas (about 5 µg m −3 in the PRD; Lin et al, 2010a;Kuang et al, 2015), urban Shanghai (about 4 µg m −3 ; Zhao et al, 2015), and urban Lanzhou (about 4.7 µg m −3 ; Tan et al, 2016). HULIS exhibited obvious seasonal variations as shown in Fig.…”

Section: General Characteristics Of Ambient Aerosolcontrasting

confidence: 59%

Quantifying primary and secondary humic-like substances in urban aerosol based on emission source characterization and a source-oriented air quality model

Han

Hopke

et al. 2019

Atmos. Chem. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Humic-like substances (HULIS) are a mixture of high-molecular-weight, water-soluble organic compounds that are widely distributed in atmospheric aerosol. Their sources are rarely studied quantitatively. Biomass burning is generally accepted as a major primary source of ambient humic-like substances (HULIS) with additional secondary material formed in the atmosphere. However, the present study provides direct evidence that residential coal burning is also a significant source of ambient HULIS, especially in the heating season in northern China based on source measurements, ambient sampling and analysis, and apportionment with source-oriented CMAQ modeling. Emission tests show that residential coal combustion produces 5 % to 24 % of the emitted organic carbon (OC) as HULIS carbon (HULISc). Estimation of primary emissions of HULIS in Beijing indicated that residential biofuel and coal burning contribute about 70 % and 25 % of annual primary HULIS, respectively. Vehicle exhaust, industry, and power plant contributions are negligible. The average concentration of ambient HULIS in PM2.5 was 7.5 µg m−3 in urban Beijing and HULIS exhibited obvious seasonal variations with the highest concentrations in winter. HULISc accounts for 7.2 % of PM2.5 mass, 24.5 % of OC, and 59.5 % of water-soluble organic carbon. HULIS are found to correlate well with K+, Cl−, sulfate, and secondary organic aerosol, suggesting its sources include biomass burning, coal combustion, and secondary aerosol formation. Source apportionment based on CMAQ modeling shows residential biofuel and coal burning and secondary formation are important sources of ambient HULIS, contributing 47.1 %, 15.1 %, and 38.9 %, respectively.

show abstract

“…The percentages of HULIS C in WSOC for summer, autumn, winter, and spring, respectively, were 66.7 % ± 5.4 %, 54.1 % ± 11.2 %, 62.3 % ± 5.7 %, and 56.6 % ± 6.3 %, with an annual average of 59.5 % ± 9.2 %, suggesting that HULIS C was the major constituent of WSOC. This value is comparable to the results (about 60 %) at urban sites in the PRD region (Lin et al, 2010b;Fan et al, 2012), Shanghai (Zhao et al, 2015), South Korea (Park et al, 2012), Budapest (Salma et al, 2007(Salma et al, , 2008(Salma et al, , 2010, and high-alpine areas of Jungfraujoch, Switzerland (Krivácsy et al, 2001). However, it is higher than the rural areas in K-puszta, Hungary (Salma et al, 2010), and the northeastern US (Pavlovic and Hopke, 2012).…”

Section: General Characteristics Of Ambient Aerosolsupporting

confidence: 88%

Response to Referee #1

Li¹

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Humic-like substances (HULIS) are a mixture of high-molecular-weight, water-soluble organic compounds that are widely distributed in atmospheric aerosol. Their sources are rarely studied quantitatively. Biomass burning is generally accepted as a major primary source of ambient humic-like substances (HULIS) with additional secondary material formed in the atmosphere. However, the present study provides direct evidence that residential coal burning is also a significant source of ambient HULIS, especially in the heating season in northern China based on source measurements, ambient sampling and analysis, and apportionment with source-oriented CMAQ modeling. Emission tests show that residential coal combustion produces 5 % to 24 % of the emitted organic carbon (OC) as HULIS carbon (HULISc). Estimation of primary emissions of HULIS in Beijing indicated that residential biofuel and coal burning contribute about 70 % and 25 % of annual primary HULIS, respectively. Vehicle exhaust, industry, and power plant contributions are negligible. The average concentration of ambient HULIS in PM 2.5 was 7.5 µg m −3 in urban Beijing and HULIS exhibited obvious seasonal variations with the highest concentrations in winter. HULISc accounts for 7.2 % of PM 2.5 mass, 24.5 % of OC, and 59.5 % of water-soluble organic carbon. HULIS are found to correlate well with K + , Cl − , sulfate, and secondary organic aerosol, suggesting its sources include biomass burning, coal combustion, and secondary aerosol formation. Source apportionment based on CMAQ modeling shows residential biofuel and coal burning and secondary formation are important sources of ambient HULIS, contributing 47.1 %, 15.1 %, and 38.9 %, respectively.

show abstract

Chemical Components, Variation, and Source Identification of PM1 during the Heavy Air Pollution Episodes in Beijing in December 2016

Cited by 30 publications

References 44 publications

Drivers for the poor air quality conditions in North China Plain during the COVID-19 outbreak

Drivers for the poor air quality conditions in North China Plain during the COVID-19 outbreak

Quantifying primary and secondary humic-like substances in urban aerosol based on emission source characterization and a source-oriented air quality model

Response to Referee #1

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About