1975
DOI: 10.2527/jas1975.402335x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical and Physical Properties of Processed Sorghum Grain Carbohydrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Micronization of HB resulted in a small decrease in its starch content, from 63.9 to 60.2% which is in agreement with McNeill et al (1975) in studies with sorghum. These authors reported that micronization decreased the contents of total carbohydrates and starch; there was an increase in the ethanol-soluble carbohydrate fraction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Micronization of HB resulted in a small decrease in its starch content, from 63.9 to 60.2% which is in agreement with McNeill et al (1975) in studies with sorghum. These authors reported that micronization decreased the contents of total carbohydrates and starch; there was an increase in the ethanol-soluble carbohydrate fraction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The protein matrix of the kernel is disrupted and many of the starch granules are ruptured and adhere together forming sheets (Harbers 1975). On the other hand, several studies have been carried out to determine the effect of micronization on the nutritive value of sorghum (McNeill et al 1975;Savage et al 1980;Savage and Clark 1988;Douglas et al 1991). Savage et al (1980) reported that micronization increased in vitro starch availability of sorghum and improved apparent digestibility of dry matter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include: genetic modification, amino-acid fortification, supplementation or complementation with protein-rich sources and processing techniques which include malting, milling and fermentation [1][2][3]. Others are steaming, pressure-cooking, flaking, puffing or micronization of the cereal starch which increase its digestibility [4]. Taylor and Robbins [5] identified malting as the most inexpensive traditional processing technique for the elimination of the nutritional impediments of sorghum-based foods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing of the grain by methods such as steaming, pressure-cooking, flaking, puffing or micronization of the starch increases the digestibility of sorghum starch. This has been attributed to a release of starch granules from the protein matrix rendering them more susceptible to enzymatic digestion (McNeil et al, 1975;Harbers, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%