2013
DOI: 10.5897/ajmr12.1014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical and microbiological quality of Anatolian Buffalo milk

Abstract: This study was carried out to determine the chemical and microbiological quality of Anatolian buffalo milk. A total of 120 Anatolian buffalo raw milk samples were collected monthly from Afyonkarahisar province, throughout the year for this study. In the chemical analysis of Anatolian buffalo milk samples the mean total solid value, non-solid fat, lipid, protein, lactose, ash and pH values were detected as 16.38%, 8.56%, 7.04%, 4.36%, 4.19%, 0.72% and 6.55, respectively. Total bacteria count (TCA), coliform, la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were reported in Table (1) showed the chemical composition of raw buffalo milk samples collected from dairy shops where there was no significant difference between them as the mean values of fat %, SNF %, protein%, Lactose % and salts % were 6.06±0.36, 9.08±0.23, 3.54±0.09, 4.73±0.14 and 0.74±0.02, respectively, while in dairy farms, the respective mean values were 6.18±0.31, 9.53±0.44, 3.89±0.09, 5.12±0.15 and 0.78±0.03. These results were in agreement with those reported by Lingathurai et al [28] and El-Leboudy et al [29], while higher results were declared by Hussain et al [30] and Zeki et al [31]. However, lower results were recorded by Enb et al [32] and Hashmi et al [33].…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results were reported in Table (1) showed the chemical composition of raw buffalo milk samples collected from dairy shops where there was no significant difference between them as the mean values of fat %, SNF %, protein%, Lactose % and salts % were 6.06±0.36, 9.08±0.23, 3.54±0.09, 4.73±0.14 and 0.74±0.02, respectively, while in dairy farms, the respective mean values were 6.18±0.31, 9.53±0.44, 3.89±0.09, 5.12±0.15 and 0.78±0.03. These results were in agreement with those reported by Lingathurai et al [28] and El-Leboudy et al [29], while higher results were declared by Hussain et al [30] and Zeki et al [31]. However, lower results were recorded by Enb et al [32] and Hashmi et al [33].…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The relationship between THI and milk quality traits has been recently investigated in 51 bulk milk samples (16); the results confirmed those of the present study, evidencing the greatest FC (8.57%) in January and the lowest (6.50%) in the summer season. On the opposite, PC was not significantly affected by the season of sampling (16,17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…All of these parameters, which can affect the quality of the end products, can vary depending on several factors, including genetics, age, parity, lactation stage, season, feeding, and geographical area of rearing (Gürler et al . ). Moreover, microbiological contamination and the presence of somatic cells can worsen the quality of milk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Europe, the countries that produce the largest quantities of buffalo milk are Italy, Turkey, Bulgaria and Greece (FAOSTAT 2014). In accordance with a recent report from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Italy is the largest producer (88%) of buffalo milk in the EU (EFSA BIOHAZ Panel 2015); in the period 1990-2012, the Italian production of buffalo milk increased from 43 000 to 192 455 t, allowing in 2012 the production (FAO-STAT 2014) of 51 910 and 37 122 t of mozzarella and mozzarella PDO (Protected Designation of Origin), respectively (Istituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria (INEA) 2012, INEA 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%