2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2006.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical and lead isotope compositions of lead artefacts from ancient Thracia (Bulgaria)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kuleff et al (2006) even report a lead anchor from the Euxine exceeding 2 wt.% Bi. However, most archaeological lead artefacts are below 100 ppm and very often below 10e20 ppm Bi, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Kuleff et al (2006) even report a lead anchor from the Euxine exceeding 2 wt.% Bi. However, most archaeological lead artefacts are below 100 ppm and very often below 10e20 ppm Bi, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…All Roman lead ingots analysed by Baron and Cochet (2003) are likewise below 10 ppm Bi. Eventually, despite some very rich artefacts, most objects reported by Kuleff et al (1995Kuleff et al ( , 2006) have a very low Bi content (<20 ppm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instead we completed the pilot study started by Skaggs in 2007 in an attempt to focus on the curse tablets that were most likely from Tunisian ore sources. Other researchers have attempted to use trace element concentrations to match lead artifacts to lead sources with varying success (Kuleff et al, 2006;Wyttenbach and Schubiger, 1973). These studies have usually combined the trace elements concentrations detected with instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) with the lead isotope analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%