1998
DOI: 10.1021/es980458p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chassis Dynamometer Study of Emissions from 21 In-Use Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles

Abstract: Regulated emissions from 21 in-use heavy-duty diesel vehicles were measured on a heavy-duty chassis dynamometer via three driving cycles using a low-sulfur diesel fuel. Emissions of particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NO x ), carbon monoxide (CO), total hydrocarbon (THC), and PM sulfate fraction were measured. For hot start tests, emissions ranged from 0.30 to 7.43 g/mi (mean 1.96) for PM; 4.15−54.0 g/mi (mean 23.3) for NO x ; 2.09−86.2 g/mi (mean 19.5) for CO; and 0.25−8.25 g/mi (mean 1.70) for THC. Whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the choice of driving cycle can impact emissions. The study detailed in Chapter 2 found that in general, g/mile emissions levels for regulated pollutants were highest for the CBD cycle, followed by the HDT cycle and the lowest emissions were generated during the WVT cycle (82). For NO x this can be seen in Figure 3 The correlation between CO and PM suggests that CO emissions would also have increased significantly with the increase in inertial weight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known that the choice of driving cycle can impact emissions. The study detailed in Chapter 2 found that in general, g/mile emissions levels for regulated pollutants were highest for the CBD cycle, followed by the HDT cycle and the lowest emissions were generated during the WVT cycle (82). For NO x this can be seen in Figure 3 The correlation between CO and PM suggests that CO emissions would also have increased significantly with the increase in inertial weight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Included in this thesis are three papers, two of which have been previously published (6,7) and the third (8) which has recently been submitted for publication. An error, regarding the rate of decline in the PM regulatory standard in the first paper (Chapter 2) was corrected, and several figures were added to the third paper (Chapter 4) for completeness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Tunnel measurements show NRPM 2.5 (NRPM Յ 2.5 m m in size) EF m for trucks of 0.5 g/kg fuel. 17 In comparable dynamometer studies, NRPM 2.5 EF m from trucks range from 0.4 to 0.9 g/kg fuel 49,50 and NRPM 2.5 EF m from buses range from 0.3 to 0.6 g/kg fuel. 51 The conversion factors and assumptions used to convert between the various EF units measured in these studies are described in the paper by Canagaratna and co-workers.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Vehicle Emission Measurements Near Thmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These include measurement techniques using chassis dynamometer studies (Whitfield et al, 1998;Yanowitz et al, 1999), traffic tunnel integration studies (Kirchstetter et al, 1999), cross-road remote-sensing studies at tunnels and other fixed sites (Bishop et al, 1989;Jiménez et al, 2000;Schifler et al, 2005), and Portable Emission Measurement System (PEMS) methods (Cadle et al, 2002). Real-world driving emissions measurement techniques may differ from dynamometer based testing techniques in several ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%