2006
DOI: 10.1177/002205740618600206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charter Schools and No Child Left Behind: Sacrificing Autonomy for Accountability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, future studies might consider why specific states do not require civics education in voucher programs. Extensive research suggests that state legislatures, generally speaking, are reluctant to impede the curricular autonomy of voucher schools, which some consider a driver of quality, efficiency, and innovation (Finnigan, 2007;Lubienski & Weitzel, 2010;Maxwell 2018;Stillings, 2006). However, the data reported in this study might better position scholars to look into the specific components of civics curricula that are voluntarily being implemented by voucher program participants, and any distinctions between such curricula within and across participating states, including the factors associated with civics curriculum adoption, whether those are political, demographic, or geographic (e.g., urban, suburban, or rural).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, future studies might consider why specific states do not require civics education in voucher programs. Extensive research suggests that state legislatures, generally speaking, are reluctant to impede the curricular autonomy of voucher schools, which some consider a driver of quality, efficiency, and innovation (Finnigan, 2007;Lubienski & Weitzel, 2010;Maxwell 2018;Stillings, 2006). However, the data reported in this study might better position scholars to look into the specific components of civics curricula that are voluntarily being implemented by voucher program participants, and any distinctions between such curricula within and across participating states, including the factors associated with civics curriculum adoption, whether those are political, demographic, or geographic (e.g., urban, suburban, or rural).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enriching instructional practices such as culturally relevant pedagogy and inquiry-based learning were often deleted from pedagogical practices in exchange for a homogenized culture of students as "an army of worksheet filler-outers" (Camp & Oesterreich, 2010). Narrowing of curriculum and dilution of instructional approaches to low-level test preparation frequently ran counter to the professional preferences of teachers and represented diminishing autonomy over the technical core of their work (Powell et al, 2009;Schoen & Fusarelli, 2008;Stillings, 2005). The perceived changes to the technical core of their work and autonomy over that work was also related to teachers' perception of demoralization which is best characterized as a disconnection from the moral rewards and ethic of the profession (Santoro, 2011a).…”
Section: Teacher Perception Of De-professionalization and Demoralizatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, instructional strategies may have become limited to test preparation activities, especially in schools that have been identified as failing (Baker et al, 2010; Malen & Rice, 2016; Mintrop & Sunderman, 2009). Finally, it has been reported that teachers’ influence over curriculum and instructional practices, either actual or perceived, has diminished in the years following the passage of NCLB (Powell, Higgins, Aram, & Freed, 2009; Schoen & Fusarelli, 2008; Stillings, 2005).…”
Section: Teacher Deprofessionalization Of Curriculum and Instruction Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schools labeled as failing under accountability systems tended to intensify effort toward short-term educational strategies, such as low-level test preparation, that may save them from sanctions rather than helping students improve academically in the long-term, and this curriculum approach can exclude students from intellectually demanding learning that is available in less-pressured schools (Baker et al, 2010; Diamond, 2012; Malen & Rice, 2016; Mintrop & Sunderman, 2009). Teachers’ influence over instructional practices also decreased in the era of school accountability (Powell et al, 2009; Schoen & Fusarelli, 2008; Stillings, 2005). Teachers in at-risk schools feel pressure to exchange enriching practices such as culturally relevant pedagogy and inquiry-based learning in exchange for a homogenized culture of students as “an army of worksheet filler-outers” (Camp & Oesterreich, 2010).…”
Section: Teacher Deprofessionalization Of Curriculum and Instruction Workmentioning
confidence: 99%