2021
DOI: 10.1017/s0068245421000022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chariot Kraters and Horse–human Relations in Late Bronze Age Greece and Cyprus

Abstract: This paper offers a new comprehensive catalogue and discussion of Late Helladic III chariot kraters, and explores what they reveal about horse–human relations in Greece and Cyprus in the Late Bronze Age. The nearly 400 known examples of chariot kraters were produced in mainland Greece and exported to Cyprus and the Levant. Although the vessels were surely adapted to local contexts, the motif of horses and chariot was part of the ‘international’ spirit of the Late Bronze Age and was meaningful throughout the ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can also tentatively identify some trends among the workshops manufacturing kraters with respect to their decoration. For instance, both kraters assigned to EuA are decorated with chariot scenes (Table 1), an iconographic theme associated with elite segments of the population and limited in their production and distribution (Recht & Morris, 2021). Our analysis confirms that one of the producers of such kraters during the 12th century BCE was located on Euboea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can also tentatively identify some trends among the workshops manufacturing kraters with respect to their decoration. For instance, both kraters assigned to EuA are decorated with chariot scenes (Table 1), an iconographic theme associated with elite segments of the population and limited in their production and distribution (Recht & Morris, 2021). Our analysis confirms that one of the producers of such kraters during the 12th century BCE was located on Euboea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would have been preferable to separate equids into wild and domestic categories but individual equid elements/fragments are notoriously difficult to classify taxonomically (Clutton-Brock 1986;Twiss et al 2017) and species identification for equid elements was not always possible or attempted for the zooarchaeological samples included in this study (see OSM2). Given the economic importance of domestic equids to archaeological civilisations within Southwest Asia (Postgate 1986;Recht 2022), we felt that it was better to include a combined equids taxonomic category as a means-albeit imperfect-of comparing the frequency of equids between sites, than to exclude their remains from the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Bronze Age Aegean, nonhuman animals and human-animal relations have received some attention (e.g. Halstead & Isaakidou, 2011; Harris & Hamilakis, 2014; Pappi & Isaakidou, 2015; Recht & Morris, 2021; papers in Laffineur & Palaima, 2021), but this is the first full-length monograph dedicated to the topic with this approach, and the first to focus specifically on Crete. Arguably, the book's importance lies just as much in its contribution to the study of Bronze Age Crete more broadly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%