2007
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.76.011501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charging dynamics of the electric double layer in porous media

Abstract: Electric double layer in porous media is studied with direct numerical simulations of the Nernst-Planck-Poisson equation. The time evolution of the charging process of the electric double-layer along a straight pore is first studied, and confirm that the time evolution obeys a power law of the exponent 1/2. We find that the diffusion constant increases effectively by the effect of the width of the pore. Next it is found that the time evolution of the charging process in fractal porous media obeys a power law, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, comparing the fitted time constants τ 1 = 200 s and τ 2 = 9000 s to τ n = 2.9 × 10 2 s and τ ad = 4.8 × 10 2 s as stated in the main text, respectively, we see that our model predicts both timescales within approximately one order of magnitude. Even though we seem to predict τ 1 better than τ 2 , using a smaller diffusion constant D = 2 × 10 −10 m 2 s −1 , to account for slow diffusion in pores [31,39], leads to τ n = 2.3 × 10 3 s and τ ad = 3.6 × 10 3 s and predictions for τ 2 are better than for τ 1 .…”
Section: Appendix C: Comparison To Experimental Surface Charge Build Upcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Still, comparing the fitted time constants τ 1 = 200 s and τ 2 = 9000 s to τ n = 2.9 × 10 2 s and τ ad = 4.8 × 10 2 s as stated in the main text, respectively, we see that our model predicts both timescales within approximately one order of magnitude. Even though we seem to predict τ 1 better than τ 2 , using a smaller diffusion constant D = 2 × 10 −10 m 2 s −1 , to account for slow diffusion in pores [31,39], leads to τ n = 2.3 × 10 3 s and τ ad = 3.6 × 10 3 s and predictions for τ 2 are better than for τ 1 .…”
Section: Appendix C: Comparison To Experimental Surface Charge Build Upcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Direct tests of the TL and BB models require numerical solutions of the full PNP equations, which becomes challenging at high potentials due to the extremely sharp gradients within thin EDLs. The TL model has been validated with the linearized PNP equations for straight pores [20], whereas nonlinear PNP studies of charging kinetics [21] were limited to low electrode potentials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacitance β is typically unity for gas transport in large pores, but it may take much larger values in nanopores to account for surface capacitance in electrochemical capacitors or surface adsorption and condensation in gas storage materials. In these applications, fluid or ion densities in molecular layers adjacent to pore walls may be several orders of magnitude greater than those in pore centers [24,25,30]. Transport coefficients are fairly well known for a number of important applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here, the flux of ions results mainly from electromigration driven by gradients of the electric potential [10,30,35]. Thus, the ionic conductivity (1/ohm-cm) of the electrolyte is the operative diffusion coefficient, D. The surface charge density is proportional to the electric potential Cf /a, where C is the surface capacitance (F/cm 2 ) and f /a is the ratio of pore surface area to pore volume with f = 2 for planar and f = 4 for circular channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%