1968
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.20.1231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charged-Particle Containment in rf-Supplemented Magnetic Mirror Machines

Abstract: We study the containment of particles in the loss cone of a magnetic-mirror machine by means of rf fields whose frequency slightly exceeds the maximum value of the ion cyclotron frequency within the plasma. We report computations which verify the adiabatic theory of this confinement system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where x 0 and y 0 are the unit vectors in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field B 0 ≈ z 0 B 0 (z), and are smooth on the scale of the oscillations amplitude; Ω = eB 0 /mc is the Larmor frequency. Although µ is often claimed to be an adiabatic invariant (Motz and Watson 1967;Watson and Kuo-Petravic 1968;Eubank 1969), this statement, rather than being proved rigorously, is usually made by analogy with the case of free Larmor rotation at zero rf field (see, though, the discussion in Grebogi et al (1979)). Consequently, conservation of µ is never examined analytically (for numerical and experimental studies, see Eubank (1969) and Watson and Kuo-Petravic (1968)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where x 0 and y 0 are the unit vectors in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field B 0 ≈ z 0 B 0 (z), and are smooth on the scale of the oscillations amplitude; Ω = eB 0 /mc is the Larmor frequency. Although µ is often claimed to be an adiabatic invariant (Motz and Watson 1967;Watson and Kuo-Petravic 1968;Eubank 1969), this statement, rather than being proved rigorously, is usually made by analogy with the case of free Larmor rotation at zero rf field (see, though, the discussion in Grebogi et al (1979)). Consequently, conservation of µ is never examined analytically (for numerical and experimental studies, see Eubank (1969) and Watson and Kuo-Petravic (1968)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although µ is often claimed to be an adiabatic invariant (Motz and Watson 1967;Watson and Kuo-Petravic 1968;Eubank 1969), this statement, rather than being proved rigorously, is usually made by analogy with the case of free Larmor rotation at zero rf field (see, though, the discussion in Grebogi et al (1979)). Consequently, conservation of µ is never examined analytically (for numerical and experimental studies, see Eubank (1969) and Watson and Kuo-Petravic (1968)). Moreover, it remains unclear exactly what is the nature of the integral (1.2) and what are the approximations under which E can be considered as a conserved quantity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the new adiabatic invariant proportional to the action of the particle Larmor rotation at frequency Ω 0 = eB/mc, v osc is the induced oscillatory velocity proportional to E [11,93,95,96], and L osc is proportional to E 2 . Suppose B ≈ẑB(z) [Eq.…”
Section: Nonrelativistic Wave Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though µ is often claimed to be an adiabatic invariant [2,7,8], this statement, rather than proven rigorously, is usually made by analogy with the case of free Larmor rotation at zero rf field (see though the discussion in [9]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, conservation of µ is never examined analytically (for numerical and experimental studies, see [7,8]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%