2009
DOI: 10.5194/acp-9-4077-2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charged and total particle formation and growth rates during EUCAARI 2007 campaign in Hyytiälä

Abstract: Abstract. Despite the fact that frequent aerosol formation has been observed in various locations in the atmosphere, the overall magnitude of the new particle formation as a particle source is still unclear. In order to understand the particle formation and growth processes, we investigate the magnitudes of the particle formation and growth rates at the size where the real atmospheric nucleation and activation occurs. The relative contribution of neutral and charged particles to the new particle formation rate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
125
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
125
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical atmospheric sulfuric acid concentration is 10 12 m −3 . If we take the DMA concentration to be equal to 5 × 10 13 m −3 , ACDC predicts a particle formation rate of around 10 6 m −3 s −1 , which is a typical new particle formation rate seen in Hyytiälä (Dal Maso et al, 2005;Manninen et al, 2009). This DMA concentration is on the high range (but approximately the same order of magnitude) as what is measured in rural boreal areas (Ge et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical atmospheric sulfuric acid concentration is 10 12 m −3 . If we take the DMA concentration to be equal to 5 × 10 13 m −3 , ACDC predicts a particle formation rate of around 10 6 m −3 s −1 , which is a typical new particle formation rate seen in Hyytiälä (Dal Maso et al, 2005;Manninen et al, 2009). This DMA concentration is on the high range (but approximately the same order of magnitude) as what is measured in rural boreal areas (Ge et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from this model point towards the dominant role of ions in NPF, especially, when the actual aerosol charged fraction is elevated in comparison to the equilibrium charging state (Yu and Turco, 2011). On the other hand, when comparing formation rates of charged particles to total particle formation rates, only a small fraction (usually less than 10 %) of the particle formation can be attributed to IIN (Manninen et al, 2009a. However, this approach does not account for ion-ion and ion-particle interactions, which are potentially contributing largely to NPF (Yu and Turco, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The attractive potential between ions and ions and between ions and the dipole moment (induced or not) of the condensable vapor reduces the thermodynamic barrier for nucleation and hence, enhances the condensational growth (Lovejoy et al, 2004;Nadykto and Yu, 2004). Conflicting views about the relative importance of IMN subsist between modelling studies (see for example Laakso et al, 2002;Harrisson and Carslaw, 2003;Yu et al, 2008) which assess that IMN should be an important source of atmospheric particles and field measurements (see for example Eisele et al, 2006;Manninen et al, 2009) who show that the contribution of IMN to new particle formation in planetary boundary layer (PBL) is less than 10% in average. In any case, the charged fraction of clusters and particles is a good indicator of the presence of neutral clusters and particles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%